Anarchopedia - Revision history

Lister34 at 23:49, 21 November 2018

2018-11-21T23:49:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 21 November 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==Article About Pedophilia==		==Article About Pedophilia==
	It has an article about paedophilia that almost copies [[Wikipedia]]'s article. <ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia</ref> In it's [[Talk Page]], a section where a user wises to rewrite the article from a nutural point-of-view, a user is proposing to delete this article, since it "is not about Anarchism".<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> A different user criticized the [[boylove]] movement by saying that [[pedophile]]s are arrogant. User further criticizes why the article on pedophihia should be written from a common point of view, "Would we accept an article about slavery that talks about how "many Negroes actually enjoyed field work and were disappointed by Emancipation" or about women's rights that claims that women actually prefer to be cattel? Perhaps an article about Shoah denial that doesn't point out that Shoah deniers are complete frauds? One hopes that the problem is obvious here as well. It's hard to see how there's any discussion at all."<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> .		It has an article about paedophilia that almost copies [[Wikipedia]]'s article. <ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia</ref> In it's [[Talk Page]], a section where a user wises to rewrite the article from a nutural point-of-view, a user is proposing to delete this article, since it "is not about Anarchism".<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> A different user criticized the [[boylove]] movement by saying that [[pedophile]]s are arrogant. User further criticizes why the article on pedophihia should be written from a common point of view, "Would we accept an article about slavery that talks about how "many Negroes actually enjoyed field work and were disappointed by Emancipation" or about women's rights that claims that women actually prefer to be cattel? Perhaps an article about Shoah denial that doesn't point out that Shoah deniers are complete frauds? One hopes that the problem is obvious here as well. It's hard to see how there's any discussion at all."<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> .

	There is truth to what she says. accepting an article on any wiki, for example, about slavery that argues that some African-Americans supposedly enjoyed being slaves, about women's rights that claim that women actually preferred to have less rights then men, or that dosen't point out the truth that Holocaust (Shoah) deniers are not telling the truth and are falsely rewriting history, would not only be inaccurate, but profoundly wrong. When it comes to pedophilia, though, it is far more complex than this. In a way though, supporting pedophiles to some is like claiming that children enjoy child sexual abuse or having their rights violated, which, from their point of view, is wrong and immoral, not to mention unlawful.

	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

Lister34 at 18:16, 25 October 2018

2018-10-25T18:16:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 25 October 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:
	It has an article about paedophilia that almost copies [[Wikipedia]]'s article. <ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia</ref> In it's [[Talk Page]], a section where a user wises to rewrite the article from a nutural point-of-view, a user is proposing to delete this article, since it "is not about Anarchism".<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> A different user criticized the [[boylove]] movement by saying that [[pedophile]]s are arrogant. User further criticizes why the article on pedophihia should be written from a common point of view, "Would we accept an article about slavery that talks about how "many Negroes actually enjoyed field work and were disappointed by Emancipation" or about women's rights that claims that women actually prefer to be cattel? Perhaps an article about Shoah denial that doesn't point out that Shoah deniers are complete frauds? One hopes that the problem is obvious here as well. It's hard to see how there's any discussion at all."<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> .		It has an article about paedophilia that almost copies [[Wikipedia]]'s article. <ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia</ref> In it's [[Talk Page]], a section where a user wises to rewrite the article from a nutural point-of-view, a user is proposing to delete this article, since it "is not about Anarchism".<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> A different user criticized the [[boylove]] movement by saying that [[pedophile]]s are arrogant. User further criticizes why the article on pedophihia should be written from a common point of view, "Would we accept an article about slavery that talks about how "many Negroes actually enjoyed field work and were disappointed by Emancipation" or about women's rights that claims that women actually prefer to be cattel? Perhaps an article about Shoah denial that doesn't point out that Shoah deniers are complete frauds? One hopes that the problem is obvious here as well. It's hard to see how there's any discussion at all."<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> .

	There is truth to what she says. accepting an article on any wiki, for example, about slavery that argues that some African-Americans supposedly enjoyed being slaves, ~~ect.~~ would not only be inaccurate, but profoundly wrong. When it comes to pedophilia, though, it is far more complex than this.		There is truth to what she says. accepting an article on any wiki, for example, about slavery that argues that some African-Americans supposedly enjoyed being slaves, about women's rights that claim that women actually preferred to have less rights then men, or that dosen't point out the truth that Holocaust (Shoah) deniers are not telling the truth and are falsely rewriting history, would not only be inaccurate, but profoundly wrong. When it comes to pedophilia, though, it is far more complex than this. In a way though, supporting pedophiles to some is like claiming that children enjoy child sexual abuse or having their rights violated, which, from their point of view, is wrong and immoral, not to mention unlawful.

	==References==		==References==

Lister34: changed some wording

2018-10-24T21:57:12Z

changed some wording

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 24 October 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:

	==Article About Pedophilia==		==Article About Pedophilia==
	It has an article about paedophilia that almost copies [[Wikipedia]]'s article. <ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia</ref> In it's [[Talk Page]], a section where a user wises to rewrite the article from a nutural point-of-view, a user is proposing to delete this article, since it "is not about Anarchism".<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> A different user criticized the [[boylove]] movement by saying that [[pedophile]]s are arrogant. User further criticizes why the article on pedophihia should be written from a common point of view, "Would we accept an article about slavery that talks about how "many Negroes actually enjoyed field work and were disappointed by Emancipation" or about women's rights that claims that women actually prefer to be ~~chattel~~? Perhaps an article about Shoah denial that doesn't point out that Shoah deniers are complete frauds? One hopes that the problem is obvious here as well. It's hard to see how there's any discussion at all."<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> .		It has an article about paedophilia that almost copies [[Wikipedia]]'s article. <ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia</ref> In it's [[Talk Page]], a section where a user wises to rewrite the article from a nutural point-of-view, a user is proposing to delete this article, since it "is not about Anarchism".<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> A different user criticized the [[boylove]] movement by saying that [[pedophile]]s are arrogant. User further criticizes why the article on pedophihia should be written from a common point of view, "Would we accept an article about slavery that talks about how "many Negroes actually enjoyed field work and were disappointed by Emancipation" or about women's rights that claims that women actually prefer to be cattel? Perhaps an article about Shoah denial that doesn't point out that Shoah deniers are complete frauds? One hopes that the problem is obvious here as well. It's hard to see how there's any discussion at all."<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> .

	There is truth to what she says. accepting an article on any wiki, for example, about slavery that argues that some African-Americans supposedly enjoyed being slaves would not only be inaccurate, but profoundly wrong. When it comes to pedophilia, though, it is far more complex than this.		There is truth to what she says. accepting an article on any wiki, for example, about slavery that argues that some African-Americans supposedly enjoyed being slaves, ect. would not only be inaccurate, but profoundly wrong. When it comes to pedophilia, though, it is far more complex than this.

	==References==		==References==

Lister34: added some more info.

2018-10-15T03:08:15Z

added some more info.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 15 October 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:

	==Article About Pedophilia==		==Article About Pedophilia==
	It has an article about paedophilia that almost copies [[Wikipedia]]'s article. <ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia</ref> In it's [[Talk Page]], a section where a user wises to rewrite the article from a nutural point-of-view, a user is proposing to delete this article, since it "is not about Anarchism".<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> A different user criticized the [[boylove]] movement by saying that [[pedophile]]s are arrogant. User further criticizes why the article on pedophihia should be written from a ~~NPOV~~, "Would we accept an article about slavery that talks about how "many Negroes actually enjoyed field work and were disappointed by Emancipation" or about women's rights that claims that women actually prefer to be chattel? Perhaps an article about Shoah denial that doesn't point out that Shoah deniers are complete frauds? One hopes that the problem is obvious here as well. It's hard to see how there's any discussion at all."<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> .		It has an article about paedophilia that almost copies [[Wikipedia]]'s article. <ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia</ref> In it's [[Talk Page]], a section where a user wises to rewrite the article from a nutural point-of-view, a user is proposing to delete this article, since it "is not about Anarchism".<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> A different user criticized the [[boylove]] movement by saying that [[pedophile]]s are arrogant. User further criticizes why the article on pedophihia should be written from a common point of view, "Would we accept an article about slavery that talks about how "many Negroes actually enjoyed field work and were disappointed by Emancipation" or about women's rights that claims that women actually prefer to be chattel? Perhaps an article about Shoah denial that doesn't point out that Shoah deniers are complete frauds? One hopes that the problem is obvious here as well. It's hard to see how there's any discussion at all."<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> .

			There is truth to what she says. accepting an article on any wiki, for example, about slavery that argues that some African-Americans supposedly enjoyed being slaves would not only be inaccurate, but profoundly wrong. When it comes to pedophilia, though, it is far more complex than this.

	==References==		==References==

Lysander: Category:Wikis

2015-04-24T20:26:45Z

Category:Wikis

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 24 April 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:

	{{stub}}		{{stub}}
	[[Category:~~Encyclopedia~~]]		[[Category:Wikis]]

Lister34: added the "category" and "stub" to my new article.

2015-03-21T06:04:56Z

added the "category" and "stub" to my new article.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:04, 21 March 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:
	*[http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Main_Page Anarchopedia]		*[http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Main_Page Anarchopedia]
	*[http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia Anarchopedia on paedophilia]		*[http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia Anarchopedia on paedophilia]

			{{stub}}
			[[Category:Encyclopedia]]

Lister34: Brought up a new page about The Wiki "Anarchopedia", and also did a littlebit of editing as well.

2015-03-21T06:02:32Z

Brought up a new page about The Wiki "Anarchopedia", and also did a littlebit of editing as well.

New page

'''Anarchopedia''' is a [[wiki]] project that was designed exclusively to be about [[anarchism]], as well, it is an experiment in anarchy. The Wiki is also an anarchistic community.

==Article About Pedophilia==
It has an article about paedophilia that almost copies [[Wikipedia]]'s article. <ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia</ref> In it's [[Talk Page]], a section where a user wises to rewrite the article from a nutural point-of-view, a user is proposing to delete this article, since it "is not about Anarchism".<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> A different user criticized the [[boylove]] movement by saying that [[pedophile]]s are arrogant. User further criticizes why the article on pedophihia should be written from a NPOV, "Would we accept an article about slavery that talks about how "many Negroes actually enjoyed field work and were disappointed by Emancipation" or about women's rights that claims that women actually prefer to be chattel? Perhaps an article about Shoah denial that doesn't point out that Shoah deniers are complete frauds? One hopes that the problem is obvious here as well. It's hard to see how there's any discussion at all."<ref>http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Talk:paedophilia</ref> .

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==Websites==
*[http://eng.anarchopedia.org/Main_Page Anarchopedia]
*[http://eng.anarchopedia.org/paedophilia Anarchopedia on paedophilia]