BoyWiki talk:Policies category encyclopedia - Revision history

Etenne at 16:34, 25 April 2016

2016-04-25T16:34:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 25 April 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
	:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is ~~that~~ section for ~~that sort of thing~~).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is the section for personal experiences and opinion).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
	::Plus I am beginning to think we need to add a sort of philosophy of editing. I am seeing far too many entries that seem to support what I would consider as child abuse such as things that seems to support sexual tourism, child prostitution, sexual sadism, forced child pornography none of which have anything to do with '''love''' or boylove. Things that are not in the spirit of boylove or good taste. Maybe I need to add a tag that says non-BL related please remove.--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		::Plus I am beginning to think we need to add a sort of philosophy of editing. I am seeing far too many entries that seem to support what I would consider as child abuse such as things that seems to support sexual tourism, child prostitution, sexual sadism, forced child pornography none of which have anything to do with '''love''' or boylove. Things that are not in the spirit of boylove or good taste. Maybe I need to add a tag that says non-BL related please remove.--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 16:11, 25 April 2016

2016-04-25T16:11:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 25 April 2016
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
	:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
	::Plus I am beginning to think we need to add a sort of philosophy of editing. I am seeing far too many entries that seem to support what I would consider as child abuse such as things that seems to support sexual tourism, child prostitution, sexual sadism, forced child pornography none of which have anything to do with '''love''' or boylove. Maybe I need to add a tag that says non-BL related please remove.--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		::Plus I am beginning to think we need to add a sort of philosophy of editing. I am seeing far too many entries that seem to support what I would consider as child abuse such as things that seems to support sexual tourism, child prostitution, sexual sadism, forced child pornography none of which have anything to do with '''love''' or boylove. Things that are not in the spirit of boylove or good taste. Maybe I need to add a tag that says non-BL related please remove.--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 15:43, 25 April 2016

2016-04-25T15:43:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 25 April 2016
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
	:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
	::Plus I am beginning to think we need to add a sort of philosophy of editing. I am seeing far too many entries that seem to support what I would consider as child abuse such as things that seems to support sexual tourism, child prostitution, sexual sadism, forced child pornography none of which have anything to do with boylove. Maybe I need to add a tag that says non-BL related please remove.--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		::Plus I am beginning to think we need to add a sort of philosophy of editing. I am seeing far too many entries that seem to support what I would consider as child abuse such as things that seems to support sexual tourism, child prostitution, sexual sadism, forced child pornography none of which have anything to do with '''love''' or boylove. Maybe I need to add a tag that says non-BL related please remove.--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 15:39, 25 April 2016

2016-04-25T15:39:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 25 April 2016
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
	:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
	::Plus I am beginning to think we need to add a sort of philosophy of editing. I am seeing far too many entries that seem to support what I would consider as child abuse such as things that seems to support sexual tourism, child prostitution, sexual sadism, forced child pornography none of which have anything to do with boylove.--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		::Plus I am beginning to think we need to add a sort of philosophy of editing. I am seeing far too many entries that seem to support what I would consider as child abuse such as things that seems to support sexual tourism, child prostitution, sexual sadism, forced child pornography none of which have anything to do with boylove. Maybe I need to add a tag that says non-BL related please remove.--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 15:37, 25 April 2016

2016-04-25T15:37:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 25 April 2016
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
	:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
			::Plus I am beginning to think we need to add a sort of philosophy of editing. I am seeing far too many entries that seem to support what I would consider as child abuse such as things that seems to support sexual tourism, child prostitution, sexual sadism, forced child pornography none of which have anything to do with boylove.--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 15:30, 25 April 2016

2016-04-25T15:30:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 25 April 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
	:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia, BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia (and well know as an anti run site), BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 15:25, 25 April 2016

2016-04-25T15:25:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:25, 25 April 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)		Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
			:Perhaps and I have no problem adding that. The real problem here is that category encyclopedia is a real mess and contains far too many entries that are simply personal opinion (i.e '''they tell instead of describe''') Also the way things are being categorized needs a good deal of improvement. Unlike Wikipedia which is only an encyclopedia, BoyWiki can include personal opinion and personal research... but they need to be categorized as such under category life (which is that section for that sort of thing).--[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 15:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

User4: Created page with "Wouldn't it be better to say: :Encyclopedia articles ''should aim to be'' factual articles... Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ped..."

2016-04-25T14:07:03Z

Created page with "Wouldn't it be better to say: :Encyclopedia articles ''should aim to be'' factual articles... Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ped..."

New page

Wouldn't it be better to say:
:Encyclopedia articles ''should aim to be'' factual articles...

Would you call the article at Wikipedia about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia Pedophilia] to be "factual"? The article if full of ''false and unsupported claims'', despite all the the wild and inaccurate statements the article contains being "correctly referenced". [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)