BoyWiki talk:Relevance policy - Revision history

Etenne: /* Films featuring boys, but not about boylove */

2015-03-23T20:14:10Z

Films featuring boys, but not about boylove

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 23 March 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Can articles be created about movies such as ''{{w\|Flight of the Navigator}}'' that aren't about boylove but sometimes inspire boylove? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 19:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)		Can articles be created about movies such as ''{{w\|Flight of the Navigator}}'' that aren't about boylove but sometimes inspire boylove? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 19:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
			:Of course, Boylove = anything about boys or boylovers. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 20:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Lysander: /* Films featuring boys, but not about boylove */ new section

2015-03-23T19:29:26Z

Films featuring boys, but not about boylove: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 23 March 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:

	There was no summary in the protection log entry. Is there a reason why only sysops should be allowed to tweak this policy? Bad edits can always be reverted. [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 22:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)		There was no summary in the protection log entry. Is there a reason why only sysops should be allowed to tweak this policy? Bad edits can always be reverted. [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 22:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

			== Films featuring boys, but not about boylove ==

			Can articles be created about movies such as ''{{w\|Flight of the Navigator}}'' that aren't about boylove but sometimes inspire boylove? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 19:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Lysander at 22:14, 16 March 2015

2015-03-16T22:14:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 16 March 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	== Protection ==		== Protection ==

	There was no summary in the protection log entry. Is there a reason why only sysops should be allowed to tweak this policy? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 22:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)		There was no summary in the protection log entry. Is there a reason why only sysops should be allowed to tweak this policy? Bad edits can always be reverted. [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 22:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Lysander: /* Protection */ new section

2015-03-16T22:14:23Z

Protection: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 16 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==GL stuff==		==GL stuff==
	This gets tricky because there's some GL stuff, e.g. the case ''[[U.S. v. Knox]]'', that also affects BLs. [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 20:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)		This gets tricky because there's some GL stuff, e.g. the case ''[[U.S. v. Knox]]'', that also affects BLs. [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 20:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

			== Protection ==

			There was no summary in the protection log entry. Is there a reason why only sysops should be allowed to tweak this policy? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 22:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Lysander: Created page with "==GL stuff== This gets tricky because there's some GL stuff, e.g. the case ''U.S. v. Knox'', that also affects BLs. ~~~~"

2015-03-15T20:45:55Z

Created page with "==GL stuff== This gets tricky because there's some GL stuff, e.g. the case ''U.S. v. Knox'', that also affects BLs. ~~~~"

New page

==GL stuff==
This gets tricky because there's some GL stuff, e.g. the case ''[[U.S. v. Knox]]'', that also affects BLs. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 20:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)