Category talk:Boylove - Revision history

User4 at 04:13, 10 May 2015

2015-05-10T04:13:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 10 May 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:

	::::::Lacking in reading comprehension much, are we? Have you read my contributions? Here's a Reading Comprehension Quiz for you: How do you spell "Bornemann"?		::::::Lacking in reading comprehension much, are we? Have you read my contributions? Here's a Reading Comprehension Quiz for you: How do you spell "Bornemann"?
			:::::::Note to any future reader of this talk page: This was the 3rd (or perhaps even the ''4th'') advisory to Lysander that the article Lysander had created, "[[Ernest Bornemann]]" was problematic - he had incorrectly entitled the article "[[Ernest Borneman]]". [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 04:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

	:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)		:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

User4 at 03:48, 10 May 2015

2015-05-10T03:48:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:48, 10 May 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Internet_dog.jpg And about proving oneself...]		::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Internet_dog.jpg And about proving oneself...]
	:::::How do we know that YOU are not Judith Reisman, wearing a KKK hood as you edit BoyWiki? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 03:34, 10 May 2015 (UTC)		:::::How do we know that YOU are not Judith Reisman, wearing a KKK hood as you edit BoyWiki? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 03:34, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

			::::::Lacking in reading comprehension much, are we? Have you read my contributions? Here's a Reading Comprehension Quiz for you: How do you spell "Bornemann"?

	:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)		:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Lysander: :::::How do we know that YOU are not Judith Reisman, wearing a KKK hood as you edit BoyWiki? ~~~~

2015-05-10T03:34:05Z

:::::How do we know that YOU are not Judith Reisman, wearing a KKK hood as you edit BoyWiki? ~~~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:34, 10 May 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::::		:::::
	::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Internet_dog.jpg And about proving oneself...]		::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Internet_dog.jpg And about proving oneself...]
			:::::How do we know that YOU are not Judith Reisman, wearing a KKK hood as you edit BoyWiki? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 03:34, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

	:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)		:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

User4 at 03:00, 10 May 2015

2015-05-10T03:00:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 10 May 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)		::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
	:::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 02:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)		:::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 02:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

			::::You know, you're right. We should allow anyone in the world to edit BoyWiki, right? ''Anyone!'' I'll put out the word to members of the KKK, to Judith Reisman, and to many others, that they can now become editors at BoyWiki! Just think of the fine articles we will have!
			:::::
			::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Internet_dog.jpg And about proving oneself...]

	:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)		:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Lysander: :::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. ~~~~

2015-05-10T02:05:01Z

:::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. ~~~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 10 May 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)		::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 02:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

	:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)		:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

User4 at 01:33, 10 May 2015

2015-05-10T01:33:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:33, 10 May 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I would argue that as a wiki about boylove that boylove is the main category and love the sub-catogory.--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 21:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)		I would argue that as a wiki about boylove that boylove is the main category and love the sub-catogory.--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 21:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

			::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

	:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)		:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Lysander: :Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? ~~~~

2015-05-09T21:50:57Z

:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? ~~~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 9 May 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I would argue that as a wiki about boylove that boylove is the main category and love the sub-catogory.--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 21:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)		I would argue that as a wiki about boylove that boylove is the main category and love the sub-catogory.--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 21:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
			:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Etenne: Created page with "I would argue that as a wiki about boylove that boylove is the main category and love the sub-catogory.--~~~~"

2015-05-09T21:38:06Z

Created page with "I would argue that as a wiki about boylove that boylove is the main category and love the sub-catogory.--~~~~"

New page

I would argue that as a wiki about boylove that boylove is the main category and love the sub-catogory.--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 21:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 10 May 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)		::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 02:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

	:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)		:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander\|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander\|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)