Category talk:Vigilante - Revision history

Etenne at 17:15, 3 November 2015

2015-11-03T17:15:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 3 November 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
	::::Still, the vigilante category ought to be subordinate to an anti activism category, in my view. There surely are lots of activists against us that aren't vigilantes. What would the appropriate term for anti activism be? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		::::Still, the vigilante category ought to be subordinate to an anti activism category, in my view. There surely are lots of activists against us that aren't vigilantes. What would the appropriate term for anti activism be? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
			::::: Terrorists (those who destroy simply for the sake of destruction) :) whereas BL activists are freedom fighters :) My personal position on neutrality of POV is about the same as those that banned you from Wikipedia. I am all for neutrality (as long as I agree with it). --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 17:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Meco: /* Activist, vigilante is POV */ still…

2015-11-03T16:58:30Z

Activist, vigilante is POV: still…

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 3 November 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), and they should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), and they should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
	:Vigilante - ''"a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate."'' There could be Boylover Vigilantes but as a class we tend to be non-violent. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		:Vigilante - ''"a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate."'' There could be Boylover Vigilantes but as a class we tend to be non-violent. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

	::Then Anita Bryant and Xavier Von Erck need their own category. They are not vigilantes, are they? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		::Then Anita Bryant and Xavier Von Erck need their own category. They are not vigilantes, are they? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
	:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
			::::Still, the vigilante category ought to be subordinate to an anti activism category, in my view. There surely are lots of activists against us that aren't vigilantes. What would the appropriate term for anti activism be? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Etenne at 16:47, 3 November 2015

2015-11-03T16:47:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 3 November 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:

	::Then Anita Bryant and Xavier Von Erck need their own category. They are not vigilantes, are they? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		::Then Anita Bryant and Xavier Von Erck need their own category. They are not vigilantes, are they? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
			:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Meco: /* Activist, vigilante is POV */ me arguing

2015-11-03T16:44:12Z

Activist, vigilante is POV: me arguing

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 3 November 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Activist, ''vigilante'' is POV==		==Activist, ''vigilante'' is POV==

	These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), ~~the~~ should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), and they should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
	:Vigilante - ''"a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate."'' There could be Boylover Vigilantes but as a class we tend to be non-violent. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		:Vigilante - ''"a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate."'' There could be Boylover Vigilantes but as a class we tend to be non-violent. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

			::Then Anita Bryant and Xavier Von Erck need their own category. They are not vigilantes, are they? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Etenne at 16:40, 3 November 2015

2015-11-03T16:40:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:40, 3 November 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), the should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), the should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
			:Vigilante - ''"a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate."'' There could be Boylover Vigilantes but as a class we tend to be non-violent. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Meco: Activist, ''vigilante'' is POV

2015-11-03T16:31:21Z

Activist, ''vigilante'' is POV

New page

==Activist, ''vigilante'' is POV==

These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), the should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 3 November 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
	::::Still, the vigilante category ought to be subordinate to an anti activism category, in my view. There surely are lots of activists against us that aren't vigilantes. What would the appropriate term for anti activism be? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		::::Still, the vigilante category ought to be subordinate to an anti activism category, in my view. There surely are lots of activists against us that aren't vigilantes. What would the appropriate term for anti activism be? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
			::::: Terrorists (those who destroy simply for the sake of destruction) :) whereas BL activists are freedom fighters :) My personal position on neutrality of POV is about the same as those that banned you from Wikipedia. I am all for neutrality (as long as I agree with it). --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 17:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 3 November 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), and they should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		These people are activits against pedophilia (or whatever the better term), and they should be labelled neutrally as such. __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
	:Vigilante - ''"a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate."'' There could be Boylover Vigilantes but as a class we tend to be non-violent. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		:Vigilante - ''"a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate."'' There could be Boylover Vigilantes but as a class we tend to be non-violent. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

	::Then Anita Bryant and Xavier Von Erck need their own category. They are not vigilantes, are they? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		::Then Anita Bryant and Xavier Von Erck need their own category. They are not vigilantes, are they? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
	:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)		:::Anita Bryant perhaps though there is some dispute about this as she incited violence against minor attracted people, but Xavier Von Erck is most certainly a Vigilante. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 16:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
			::::Still, the vigilante category ought to be subordinate to an anti activism category, in my view. There surely are lots of activists against us that aren't vigilantes. What would the appropriate term for anti activism be? __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 16:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)