Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys (film) - Revision history

Etenne at 00:48, 28 June 2022

2022-06-28T00:48:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:48, 28 June 2022
Line 30:		Line 30:
	*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_Hawk:_Men_Who_Love_Boys Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys (Wikipedia)]		*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_Hawk:_Men_Who_Love_Boys Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys (Wikipedia)]

			{{Navbox/film}}
	[[Category:Documentary films]]		[[Category:Documentary films]]
	[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]		[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]
	[[Category:English-language films]]		[[Category:English-language films]]

Dandelion: Modified the name of a category

2021-03-05T16:00:18Z

Modified the name of a category

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 5 March 2021
Line 31:		Line 31:


	[[Category:Documentary]]		[[Category:Documentary films]]
	[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]		[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]
	[[Category:English-language films]]		[[Category:English-language films]]

Etenne: /* External links */

2016-02-26T14:06:02Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:06, 26 February 2016
Line 33:		Line 33:
	[[Category:Documentary]]		[[Category:Documentary]]
	[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]		[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]
			[[Category:English-language films]]

Etenne: /* External links */

2016-02-25T14:48:03Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 25 February 2016
Line 30:		Line 30:
	*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_Hawk:_Men_Who_Love_Boys Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys (Wikipedia)]		*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_Hawk:_Men_Who_Love_Boys Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys (Wikipedia)]

	~~[[Category:film]]~~
	[[Category:Documentary]]		[[Category:Documentary]]
	[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]		[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]

Etenne at 12:31, 18 May 2015

2015-05-18T12:31:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 18 May 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	}}		}}
	'''Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys''' is a 1994 award winning documentary produced, written and directed by Adi Sideman. The term, "''chicken hawk''," is a (usually) derogatory label gay slang term to refer to an older man who pursue relationships with younger men and boys.<ref>[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chicken%20hawk chicken hawk (Merriam-Webster Dictionary)]</ref>		'''Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys''' is a 1994 award winning documentary produced, written and directed by Adi Sideman. The term, "''chicken hawk''," is a (usually) derogatory label gay slang term to refer to an older man who pursue relationships with younger men and boys.<ref>[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chicken%20hawk chicken hawk (Merriam-Webster Dictionary)]</ref>
	~~{{clr}}~~


	==Slant of the film==		==Slant of the film==
	The film was (apparently) edited to sensationalize the topic, and is similar in tone and accuracy to the 1936 George Hirliman film "[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 Reefer Madness".] ''TV Guide'' states that: "While Sideman has done a good job ferreting out raw material, his organizational skills leave much to be desired. As characters flash by unidentified, time and place are allowed to blur, and CHICKEN HAWK emerges as a cluttered, often perplexing, affair."<ref>[http://movies.tvguide.com/chicken-hawk-men-who-love-boys/review/129977 TV Guide Review: Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys]</ref> In an interview entitled, "''The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching''"<ref>[http://nypress.com/the-filmmaker-who-looked-at-pederasty-without-flinching/ The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching.]</ref> Adi Sideman expresses his pride that the film is used by law enforcement to profile [[MAP\|minor attracted people]] for pedophile hunters within the FBI. He stated, " I let the men in the film hang themselves". Sideman also had stated in the interview about Leyland Stevenson:		The film was (apparently) edited to sensationalize the topic, and is similar in tone and accuracy to the 1936 George Hirliman film "[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 Reefer Madness".] ''TV Guide'' states that: "While Sideman has done a good job ferreting out raw material, his organizational skills leave much to be desired. As characters flash by unidentified, time and place are allowed to blur, and CHICKEN HAWK emerges as a cluttered, often perplexing, affair."<ref>[http://movies.tvguide.com/chicken-hawk-men-who-love-boys/review/129977 TV Guide Review: Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys]</ref> In an interview entitled, "''The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching''"<ref>[http://nypress.com/the-filmmaker-who-looked-at-pederasty-without-flinching/ The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching.]</ref> Adi Sideman expresses his pride that the film is used by law enforcement to profile [[MAP\|minor attracted people]] for pedophile hunters within the FBI. He stated, " I let the men in the film hang themselves". Sideman also had stated in the interview about Leyland Stevenson:

Etenne: /* External links */

2015-03-22T11:33:40Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 22 March 2015
Line 29:		Line 29:

	[[Category:film]]		[[Category:film]]
			[[Category:Documentary]]
	[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]		[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]

Lister34 at 08:59, 12 March 2015

2015-03-12T08:59:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:59, 12 March 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	The film was (apparently) edited to sensationalize the topic, and is similar in tone and accuracy to the 1936 George Hirliman film "[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 Reefer Madness".] ''TV Guide'' states that: "While Sideman has done a good job ferreting out raw material, his organizational skills leave much to be desired. As characters flash by unidentified, time and place are allowed to blur, and CHICKEN HAWK emerges as a cluttered, often perplexing, affair."<ref>[http://movies.tvguide.com/chicken-hawk-men-who-love-boys/review/129977 TV Guide Review: Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys]</ref> In an interview entitled, "''The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching''"<ref>[http://nypress.com/the-filmmaker-who-looked-at-pederasty-without-flinching/ The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching.]</ref> Adi Sideman expresses his pride that the film is used by law enforcement to profile [[MAP\|minor attracted people]] for pedophile hunters within the FBI. He stated, " I let the men in the film hang themselves". Sideman also had stated in the interview about Leyland Stevenson:		The film was (apparently) edited to sensationalize the topic, and is similar in tone and accuracy to the 1936 George Hirliman film "[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 Reefer Madness".] ''TV Guide'' states that: "While Sideman has done a good job ferreting out raw material, his organizational skills leave much to be desired. As characters flash by unidentified, time and place are allowed to blur, and CHICKEN HAWK emerges as a cluttered, often perplexing, affair."<ref>[http://movies.tvguide.com/chicken-hawk-men-who-love-boys/review/129977 TV Guide Review: Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys]</ref> In an interview entitled, "''The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching''"<ref>[http://nypress.com/the-filmmaker-who-looked-at-pederasty-without-flinching/ The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching.]</ref> Adi Sideman expresses his pride that the film is used by law enforcement to profile [[MAP\|minor attracted people]] for pedophile hunters within the FBI. He stated, " I let the men in the film hang themselves". Sideman also had stated in the interview about Leyland Stevenson:

	~~<blockquote>~~"I found Leyland Stevenson, one of the men in the film, particularly repellent. How did you feel when he spoke with obvious joy of taking his young "friend" on a camping trip and having sex with him? That was such gross manipulation on Stevenson's part."~~<blockquote>~~		"I found Leyland Stevenson, one of the men in the film, particularly repellent. How did you feel when he spoke with obvious joy of taking his young "friend" on a camping trip and having sex with him? That was such gross manipulation on Stevenson's part."

	==Scenes from the film==		==Scenes from the film==

Lister34: Added in the statement spoken by Saidman on Stevenson.

2015-03-12T08:59:26Z

Added in the statement spoken by Saidman on Stevenson.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:59, 12 March 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:
	{{clr}}		{{clr}}
	==Slant of the film==		==Slant of the film==
	The film was (apparently) edited to sensationalize the topic, and is similar in tone and accuracy to the 1936 George Hirliman film "[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 Reefer Madness".] ''TV Guide'' states that: "While Sideman has done a good job ferreting out raw material, his organizational skills leave much to be desired. As characters flash by unidentified, time and place are allowed to blur, and CHICKEN HAWK emerges as a cluttered, often perplexing, affair."<ref>[http://movies.tvguide.com/chicken-hawk-men-who-love-boys/review/129977 TV Guide Review: Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys]</ref> In an interview entitled, "''The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching''"<ref>[http://nypress.com/the-filmmaker-who-looked-at-pederasty-without-flinching/ The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching.]</ref> Adi Sideman expresses his pride that the film is used by law enforcement to profile [[MAP\|minor attracted people]] for pedophile hunters within the FBI. He stated, " I let the men in the film hang themselves".		The film was (apparently) edited to sensationalize the topic, and is similar in tone and accuracy to the 1936 George Hirliman film "[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 Reefer Madness".] ''TV Guide'' states that: "While Sideman has done a good job ferreting out raw material, his organizational skills leave much to be desired. As characters flash by unidentified, time and place are allowed to blur, and CHICKEN HAWK emerges as a cluttered, often perplexing, affair."<ref>[http://movies.tvguide.com/chicken-hawk-men-who-love-boys/review/129977 TV Guide Review: Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys]</ref> In an interview entitled, "''The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching''"<ref>[http://nypress.com/the-filmmaker-who-looked-at-pederasty-without-flinching/ The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching.]</ref> Adi Sideman expresses his pride that the film is used by law enforcement to profile [[MAP\|minor attracted people]] for pedophile hunters within the FBI. He stated, " I let the men in the film hang themselves". Sideman also had stated in the interview about Leyland Stevenson:

			<blockquote>"I found Leyland Stevenson, one of the men in the film, particularly repellent. How did you feel when he spoke with obvious joy of taking his young "friend" on a camping trip and having sex with him? That was such gross manipulation on Stevenson's part."<blockquote>

	==Scenes from the film==		==Scenes from the film==

Etenne: /* External links */

2015-03-02T03:13:58Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 2 March 2015
Line 27:		Line 27:

	[[Category:film]]		[[Category:film]]
	[[Boylove in modern times‏‎]]		[[Category:Boylove in modern times‏‎]]
	~~[[Encyclopedia‏‎~~]]

Etenne at 03:11, 2 March 2015

2015-03-02T03:11:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:11, 2 March 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	}}		}}
	'''Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys''' is a 1994 award winning documentary produced, written and directed by Adi Sideman. The term, "''chicken hawk''," is a (usually) derogatory label gay slang term to refer to an older man who pursue relationships with younger men and boys.<ref>[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chicken%20hawk chicken hawk (Merriam-Webster Dictionary)]</ref>		'''Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys''' is a 1994 award winning documentary produced, written and directed by Adi Sideman. The term, "''chicken hawk''," is a (usually) derogatory label gay slang term to refer to an older man who pursue relationships with younger men and boys.<ref>[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chicken%20hawk chicken hawk (Merriam-Webster Dictionary)]</ref>
			{{clr}}
	==Slant of the film==		==Slant of the film==
	The film was (apparently) edited to sensationalize the topic, and is similar in tone and accuracy to the 1936 George Hirliman film "[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 Reefer Madness".] ''TV Guide'' states that: "While Sideman has done a good job ferreting out raw material, his organizational skills leave much to be desired. As characters flash by unidentified, time and place are allowed to blur, and CHICKEN HAWK emerges as a cluttered, often perplexing, affair."<ref>[http://movies.tvguide.com/chicken-hawk-men-who-love-boys/review/129977 TV Guide Review: Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys]</ref> In an interview entitled, "''The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching''"<ref>[http://nypress.com/the-filmmaker-who-looked-at-pederasty-without-flinching/ The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching.]</ref> Adi Sideman expresses his pride that the film is used by law enforcement to profile [[MAP\|minor attracted people]] for pedophile hunters within the FBI. He stated, " I let the men in the film hang themselves".		The film was (apparently) edited to sensationalize the topic, and is similar in tone and accuracy to the 1936 George Hirliman film "[https://archive.org/details/reefer_madness1938 Reefer Madness".] ''TV Guide'' states that: "While Sideman has done a good job ferreting out raw material, his organizational skills leave much to be desired. As characters flash by unidentified, time and place are allowed to blur, and CHICKEN HAWK emerges as a cluttered, often perplexing, affair."<ref>[http://movies.tvguide.com/chicken-hawk-men-who-love-boys/review/129977 TV Guide Review: Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys]</ref> In an interview entitled, "''The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching''"<ref>[http://nypress.com/the-filmmaker-who-looked-at-pederasty-without-flinching/ The filmmaker who looked at pederasty without flinching.]</ref> Adi Sideman expresses his pride that the film is used by law enforcement to profile [[MAP\|minor attracted people]] for pedophile hunters within the FBI. He stated, " I let the men in the film hang themselves".
Line 17:		Line 17:
	<blockquote>"In the end, Chicken Hawk is unmercifully fair, as neither side holds much credibility. The NAMBLA members come off looking like a deluded bunch of perverts, while the conservative forces opposing them offer up an image of bullying, foul-mouthed rednecks hurling unspeakably homophobic playground vulgarities at pathetically easy targets. It is precisely this balance that makes the film so fascinating, not to mention somewhat frustrating, for Sideman's camera merely records and documents facts, events, and opinions, rather than interpret them." <ref>[http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/vol14/issue45/arts.scanlines.html Review in The Austin Chronicle] </ref></blockquote>		<blockquote>"In the end, Chicken Hawk is unmercifully fair, as neither side holds much credibility. The NAMBLA members come off looking like a deluded bunch of perverts, while the conservative forces opposing them offer up an image of bullying, foul-mouthed rednecks hurling unspeakably homophobic playground vulgarities at pathetically easy targets. It is precisely this balance that makes the film so fascinating, not to mention somewhat frustrating, for Sideman's camera merely records and documents facts, events, and opinions, rather than interpret them." <ref>[http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/vol14/issue45/arts.scanlines.html Review in The Austin Chronicle] </ref></blockquote>

	~~{{clr}}~~

	==References==		==References==