Dennis Hastert - Revision history

Etenne at 14:05, 29 April 2016

2016-04-29T14:05:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 29 April 2016
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Had Hastert ''not'' filed a complaint about alleged blackmail, and had ''not'' made any statements to the legal authorities about why he withdrew money, he would most likely never have been prosecuted.		Had Hastert ''not'' filed a complaint about alleged blackmail, and had ''not'' made any statements to the legal authorities about why he withdrew money, he would most likely never have been prosecuted.

	The "age of consent" in Illinois in the 60s and 70s may very well have been such that Hastert actually committed no criminal offenses by having sexually touched the boys as he did.		The "age of consent" in Illinois in the 60s and 70s may very well have been such that Hastert actually committed no criminal offenses by having sexually touched the boys as he did.{{cite}}

	==References==		==References==

Etenne at 14:03, 29 April 2016

2016-04-29T14:03:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 29 April 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Dennis Hastert is a former U.S. House Speaker who was judicially abused and sentenced to prison in a case related to his being a BoyLover.		Dennis Hastert is a former U.S. House Speaker who was judicially abused and sentenced to prison in a case related to his possibly being a BoyLover.

	The case centered around his (alleged) "sexual abuse" of students whom he coached in wrestling, and ''not'' around the (alleged) illegal withdrawals of money.		The case centered around his (alleged) "sexual abuse" of students whom he coached in wrestling, and ''not'' around the (alleged) illegal withdrawals of money.

Etenne: /* See also */

2016-04-29T14:01:51Z

Etenne at 14:01, 29 April 2016

2016-04-29T14:01:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 29 April 2016
Line 22:		Line 22:

	[[Category:Law]]		[[Category:Law]]
	[[Category:~~People~~]]		[[Category:Category:Politicians]]

Etenne at 13:59, 29 April 2016

2016-04-29T13:59:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 29 April 2016
Line 22:		Line 22:

	[[Category:Law]]		[[Category:Law]]
	[[Category:~~Judicial Abuse of power~~]]		[[Category:People]]

User4: /* See also */

2016-04-27T23:06:38Z

User4 at 23:05, 27 April 2016

2016-04-27T23:05:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 27 April 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:[P]rosecutors detailed in a 26-page sentencing filing that Hastert had abused at least five teenage students connected to the Yorkville wrestling team in the 1960s and 1970s.<ref>https://archive.is/YmJcC</ref>		:[P]rosecutors detailed in a 26-page sentencing filing that Hastert had abused at least five teenage students connected to the Yorkville wrestling team in the 1960s and 1970s.<ref>https://archive.is/YmJcC</ref>

	Hastert had withdrawn money in installments of less than $10,000 each (which is below the amounts which trigger filing a report on the withdrawal to the government) in order to amass $1.7 in order to pay off what he claimed ~~this~~ in a criminal complaint he had filed in 2015 as an extorsion attempt by a former student.		Hastert had withdrawn money in installments of less than $10,000 each (which is below the amounts which trigger filing a report on the withdrawal to the government) in order to amass $1.7 in order to pay off what he claimed in a criminal complaint he had filed in 2015 to be an extorsion attempt by a former student.

	Little did Hastert realize that being a BoyLover makes one a target for judicial abuse of authority, as happened in his case. The trial was ostensibly about the so-called "illegal withdrawals" (what Hastert did when he withdrew the money is very common, and apparently is not usually considered to be criminal, unless, of course, one is a BoyLover).		Little did Hastert realize that being a BoyLover makes one a target for judicial abuse of authority, as happened in his case. The trial was ostensibly about the so-called "illegal withdrawals" (what Hastert did when he withdrew the money is very common, and apparently is not usually considered to be criminal, unless, of course, one is a BoyLover).

User4: Created page with "Dennis Hastert is a former U.S. House Speaker who was judicially abused and sentenced to prison in a case related to his being a BoyLover. The case centered around his (alleg..."

2016-04-27T23:00:58Z

Created page with "Dennis Hastert is a former U.S. House Speaker who was judicially abused and sentenced to prison in a case related to his being a BoyLover. The case centered around his (alleg..."

New page

Dennis Hastert is a former U.S. House Speaker who was judicially abused and sentenced to prison in a case related to his being a BoyLover.

The case centered around his (alleged) "sexual abuse" of students whom he coached in wrestling, and ''not'' around the (alleged) illegal withdrawals of money.

:[P]rosecutors detailed in a 26-page sentencing filing that Hastert had abused at least five teenage students connected to the Yorkville wrestling team in the 1960s and 1970s.<ref>https://archive.is/YmJcC</ref>

Hastert had withdrawn money in installments of less than $10,000 each (which is below the amounts which trigger filing a report on the withdrawal to the government) in order to amass $1.7 in order to pay off what he claimed this in a criminal complaint he had filed in 2015 as an extorsion attempt by a former student.

Little did Hastert realize that being a BoyLover makes one a target for judicial abuse of authority, as happened in his case. The trial was ostensibly about the so-called "illegal withdrawals" (what Hastert did when he withdrew the money is very common, and apparently is not usually considered to be criminal, unless, of course, one is a BoyLover).

All the reported "testimony" in the news media was made by the (alleged) "victims," and in actuality had nothing to do with the charges filed against him for (supposedly) illegally withdrawing money.

Had Hastert ''not'' filed a complaint about alleged blackmail, and had ''not'' made any statements to the legal authorities about why he withdrew money, he would most likely never have been prosecuted.

The "age of consent" in Illinois in the 60s and 70s may very well have been such that Hastert actually committed no criminal offenses by having sexually touched the boys as he did.

==References==
{{reflist}}

==See also==
[[BoyLover mistakes leading to arrest and conviction]]

*[[Category:Law]]
*[[Category:Judicial Abuse of power]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 27 April 2016
Line 21:		Line 21:
	[[BoyLover mistakes leading to arrest and conviction]]		[[BoyLover mistakes leading to arrest and conviction]]

	*[[Category:Law]]		[[Category:Law]]
	*[[Category:Judicial Abuse of power]]		[[Category:Judicial Abuse of power]]