Draft talk:Child prostitution - Revision history

Dragonlover: Dragonlover moved page Talk:Child prostitution to Draft talk:Child prostitution: Page incomplete. Needs references.

2016-04-24T14:51:34Z

Dragonlover moved page Talk:Child prostitution to Draft talk:Child prostitution: Page incomplete. Needs references.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 24 April 2016
(No difference)

User4 at 07:05, 24 April 2016

2016-04-24T07:05:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:05, 24 April 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
	::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and adds to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these things are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel that I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can write much better then this if you took your time and focused on one article at a time. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and adds to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these things are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel that I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can write much better then this if you took your time and focused on one article at a time. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
			:
			:::The Wikipedia article on Child Prostitution ''is absolutely full of shit!'' (just as is their article on Pedophilie). Just as the books that I have now included in the Bibliography to the article "deconstruct" the concepts of "trafficking" with regards to woman and children, ''entire volumes'' could also be written to do the same for the concept of "child prostitution". Unfortunately, I do not have the time to write those books, and the qualified academics in the field of human sexuality are not willing to ''commit academic suicide'' by doing so, either. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 07:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 21:58, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T21:58:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 19 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).		:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).
	:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
	::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and adds to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these things are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can write much better then this if you took your time and focused on one article at a time. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and adds to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these things are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel that I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can write much better then this if you took your time and focused on one article at a time. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 21:57, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T21:57:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 19 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).		:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).
	:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
	::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and adds to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these things are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can better. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and adds to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these things are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can write much better then this if you took your time and focused on one article at a time. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 21:54, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T21:54:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 19 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).		:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).
	:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
	::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and ~~add~~ to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these ~~thongs~~ are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can better. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and adds to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these things are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can better. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 21:52, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T21:52:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 19 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).		:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).
	:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
	::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer if you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and add to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these thongs are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can better. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 21:25, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T21:25:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 19 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).		:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).
	:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
	::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, personal opinion, and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer if you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer if you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 21:24, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T21:24:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 19 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).		:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).
	:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
	::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such. Personally, I would prefer if you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, personal opinion, and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer if you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 21:23, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T21:23:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 19 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).		:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).
	:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
	::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such. Personally, I would prefer if you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such. Personally, I would prefer if you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Etenne at 21:10, 19 April 2016

2016-04-19T21:10:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 19 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).		:I have seen how many of these boys live, and I have even met some of their families, who were completely aware of what the boys were involved in. Of course, "the plural of anecdote is not data",<ref>See http://freakonomics.com/2010/04/29/quotes-uncovered-whats-the-plural-of-anecdote/ </ref> (it took only two minutes to find ''that'' reference) and that applies to me as well as the NGOs and others supposedly "researching" the question. But the chance of ''their'' anecdotal evidence being highly unrepresentative is, I believe, much higher than that for my anecdotal evidence. And the references which ''those'' researchers give are always to ''other researchers'' who have based their conclusions on equally unrepresentative anecdotal evidence (often from clinical patients while in treatment).
	:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
	::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such. Personally, I would prefer if you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such. Personally, I would prefer if you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:05, 24 April 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		:Anyway, I'll do what I can about references, but it won't be soon as it is very difficult to find them due to the problems mentioned above. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
	::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and adds to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these things are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel that I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can write much better then this if you took your time and focused on one article at a time. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)		::"''Isn't it true that most articles we have do not contain references?''" No, that isn't true. If you are going to write encyclopedic type (Encyclopedia articles are factual articles ) entries and categorize them in [[:Category:Encyclopedia]] then you '''absolutely''' need to take the time to research it and reference it, or don't do it at all. However, if you simple wish to write essays and personal antidotes or personal option articles then they need to be categorized as such under [[:Category:life]] and labeled as such (Life articles focus on the day to day life and community of boys and boylovers. In these categories, you will find information covering a wide array of things that touch on everyday life, including news, jokes, food, '''personal opinion''', and personal stories from around the world. ). Personally, I would prefer that you added less pages but worked more on making the ones you do add as complete as possible. On other wikis that have numerous users who come along and finish and improve other peoples work that is less necessary however on BoyWiki if you don't finish your work, it could take years for someone to come along and adds to it. I would add that this is particularity true for the subject matter of this page as it tends to be a emotive issue, so if you are going to say it then you absolutely need to back it up. To a person as educated as yourself that should go without saying. I understand it is a difficult thing to accomplish and these things are not easy to find. But I know you can do better work then this and if you feel that I am being hard on you it is simply because I know you can write much better then this if you took your time and focused on one article at a time. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png\|50 px\|link=Etenne]] 21:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
			:
			:::The Wikipedia article on Child Prostitution ''is absolutely full of shit!'' (just as is their article on Pedophilie). Just as the books that I have now included in the Bibliography to the article "deconstruct" the concepts of "trafficking" with regards to woman and children, ''entire volumes'' could also be written to do the same for the concept of "child prostitution". Unfortunately, I do not have the time to write those books, and the qualified academics in the field of human sexuality are not willing to ''commit academic suicide'' by doing so, either. [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 07:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)