Richard Stallman - Revision history

Eskimo: internal link to prudery removed

2016-09-21T04:09:03Z

internal link to prudery removed

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:09, 21 September 2016
Line 24:		Line 24:
	{{cquote\|West Virginia proposes to 'protect' girls from the risk of embarrassment due to [[sexting]] by piling punishment on top.		{{cquote\|West Virginia proposes to 'protect' girls from the risk of embarrassment due to [[sexting]] by piling punishment on top.

	When sex is concerned, we see many proposals to punish those who are mistreated in one way or another. I think that this is just [[prudery]] at work — the talk about "helping" or "protecting" is just a disguise.		When sex is concerned, we see many proposals to punish those who are mistreated in one way or another. I think that this is just prudery at work — the talk about "helping" or "protecting" is just a disguise.

	If we really want to help people, we need to think about why they get hurt. The US has a ridiculous taboo on [[nudity]], and women who show their sexuality are sneered at. This is tied up with [[sexism]], [[mysogyny]], and [[religion]]. If a girl feels hurt due to publication of a nude photo of her, this [[stigma]] is probably why it hurts.		If we really want to help people, we need to think about why they get hurt. The US has a ridiculous taboo on [[nudity]], and women who show their sexuality are sneered at. This is tied up with [[sexism]], [[mysogyny]], and [[religion]]. If a girl feels hurt due to publication of a nude photo of her, this [[stigma]] is probably why it hurts.

Etenne: /* Quotes */

2015-11-07T21:59:11Z

Quotes

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 7 November 2015
Line 22:		Line 22:

	On May 22, 2013, he declared on his website:<ref>http://stallman.org/archives/2013-mar-jun.html#22_May_2013_%28West_Virginia_proposes_to_protect_girls_by_punishing_them_for_sexting%29</ref>		On May 22, 2013, he declared on his website:<ref>http://stallman.org/archives/2013-mar-jun.html#22_May_2013_%28West_Virginia_proposes_to_protect_girls_by_punishing_them_for_sexting%29</ref>
	{{cquote\|West Virginia proposes to 'protect' girls from the risk of embarrassment due to sexting by piling punishment on top.		{{cquote\|West Virginia proposes to 'protect' girls from the risk of embarrassment due to [[sexting]] by piling punishment on top.

	When sex is concerned, we see many proposals to punish those who are mistreated in one way or another. I think that this is just [[prudery]] at work — the talk about "helping" or "protecting" is just a disguise.		When sex is concerned, we see many proposals to punish those who are mistreated in one way or another. I think that this is just [[prudery]] at work — the talk about "helping" or "protecting" is just a disguise.

Lysander: teach -> teaching

2015-04-23T21:36:32Z

teach -> teaching

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 23 April 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	He wrote the most of the GNU project philosophy: Show because he created the GNU project and a philosophy that all projects that are part of the GNU project should follow.		He wrote the most of the GNU project philosophy: Show because he created the GNU project and a philosophy that all projects that are part of the GNU project should follow.

	He is interested in ~~teach~~ people to value their freedoms and fight for them. <ref>http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/rms-kol.html</ref> He says that child pornographers and terrorism are used as a excuse to take people freedom.<ref>"The big enemy of freedom is governments taking too much power over society. They do that with two excuses: the excuse is terrorists or child pornographers. But we have to realise that anti-freedom is a bigger danger than either of those. For instance, censoring the internet. We must not accept laws allowing punishment without a fair trial." http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/the-law-of-success-2.html</ref>		He is interested in teaching people to value their freedoms and fight for them. <ref>http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/rms-kol.html</ref> He says that child pornographers and terrorism are used as a excuse to take people freedom.<ref>"The big enemy of freedom is governments taking too much power over society. They do that with two excuses: the excuse is terrorists or child pornographers. But we have to realise that anti-freedom is a bigger danger than either of those. For instance, censoring the internet. We must not accept laws allowing punishment without a fair trial." http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/the-law-of-success-2.html</ref>

	==Quotes==		==Quotes==

Lysander: The big enemy of freedom is governments taking too much power over society. They do that with two excuses: the excuse is terrorists or child pornographers. But we have to realise that anti-freedom is a bigger danger than either of those. For instance, cen

2015-04-23T17:05:45Z

The big enemy of freedom is governments taking too much power over society. They do that with two excuses: the excuse is terrorists or child pornographers. But we have to realise that anti-freedom is a bigger danger than either of those. For instance, cen

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:05, 23 April 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	He wrote the most of the GNU project philosophy: Show because he created the GNU project and a philosophy that all projects that are part of the GNU project should follow.		He wrote the most of the GNU project philosophy: Show because he created the GNU project and a philosophy that all projects that are part of the GNU project should follow.

	He is interested in teach people to value their freedoms and fight for them. <ref>http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/rms-kol.html</ref> He says that child pornographers and terrorism are used as a excuse to take people freedom. <ref>http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/the-law-of-success-2.html</ref>		He is interested in teach people to value their freedoms and fight for them. <ref>http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/rms-kol.html</ref> He says that child pornographers and terrorism are used as a excuse to take people freedom.<ref>"The big enemy of freedom is governments taking too much power over society. They do that with two excuses: the excuse is terrorists or child pornographers. But we have to realise that anti-freedom is a bigger danger than either of those. For instance, censoring the internet. We must not accept laws allowing punishment without a fair trial." http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/the-law-of-success-2.html</ref>

	==Quotes==		==Quotes==

Lysander: /* Quotes */

2015-04-23T17:03:57Z

Quotes

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 23 April 2015
Line 22:		Line 22:

	On May 22, 2013, he declared on his website:<ref>http://stallman.org/archives/2013-mar-jun.html#22_May_2013_%28West_Virginia_proposes_to_protect_girls_by_punishing_them_for_sexting%29</ref>		On May 22, 2013, he declared on his website:<ref>http://stallman.org/archives/2013-mar-jun.html#22_May_2013_%28West_Virginia_proposes_to_protect_girls_by_punishing_them_for_sexting%29</ref>
	{{cquote\|West Virginia proposes to 'protect' girls from the risk of embarrassment due to sexting by piling punishment on top. When sex is concerned, we see many proposals to punish those who are mistreated in one way or another. I think that this is just [[prudery]] at work — the talk about "helping" or "protecting" is just a disguise. If we really want to help people, we need to think about why they get hurt. The US has a ridiculous taboo on [[nudity]], and women who show their sexuality are sneered at. This is tied up with [[sexism]], [[mysogyny]], and [[religion]]. If a girl feels hurt due to publication of a nude photo of her, this [[stigma]] is probably why it hurts.		{{cquote\|West Virginia proposes to 'protect' girls from the risk of embarrassment due to sexting by piling punishment on top.

			When sex is concerned, we see many proposals to punish those who are mistreated in one way or another. I think that this is just [[prudery]] at work — the talk about "helping" or "protecting" is just a disguise.

			If we really want to help people, we need to think about why they get hurt. The US has a ridiculous taboo on [[nudity]], and women who show their sexuality are sneered at. This is tied up with [[sexism]], [[mysogyny]], and [[religion]]. If a girl feels hurt due to publication of a nude photo of her, this [[stigma]] is probably why it hurts.

	One way to destigmatize something is to get lots of people doing it. I made the suggestion that Facebook should require every user to provide a nude photo. This was a joke — no one should use Facebook! — but also serious. If lots of teenagers post nude photos, so that it becomes normal, the stigma will be gone.}}		One way to destigmatize something is to get lots of people doing it. I made the suggestion that Facebook should require every user to provide a nude photo. This was a joke — no one should use Facebook! — but also serious. If lots of teenagers post nude photos, so that it becomes normal, the stigma will be gone.}}

Lysander: /* Quotes */ rearrange, reformat

2015-04-23T17:02:50Z

Quotes: rearrange, reformat

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 23 April 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Quotes==		==Quotes==
			On June, 28th, 2003, he declared on his website<ref>http://www.stallman.org/archives/2003-may-aug.html</ref>, on sexuality:<ref>"Rhinophytonecrophilia" refers to smelling flowers.</ref>
			{{cquote\|Dubya has nominated another caveman for a federal appeals court. Refreshingly, the Democratic Party is organizing opposition.

	*On June, ~~28th~~, ~~2003~~, ~~he declared on his website<ref>http://www~~.~~stallman.org/archives/2003~~-~~may~~-~~aug~~.~~html</ref>, on sexuality:~~		The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.

	'prostitution, ~~adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography~~, and ~~even incest~~ and ~~pedophilia" [~~.~~..] All of these acts should~~ be ~~legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness~~.		Some rules might be called for when these acts directly affect other people's interests. For incest, contraception could be mandatory to avoid risk of inbreeding. For prostitution, a license should be required to ensure prostitutes get regular medical check-ups, and they should have training and support in insisting on use of condoms. This will be an advance in public health, compared with the situation today.

	Some rules might be called for when these acts directly affect other people's interests. For incest, contraception could be mandatory to avoid risk of inbreeding. For prostitution, a license should be required to ensure prostitutes get regular medical check-ups, and they should have training and support in insisting on use of condoms. This will be an advance in public health, compared with the situation today. For necrophilia, it might be necessary to ask the next of kin for permission if the decedent's will did not authorize it. Necrophilia would be my second choice for what should be done with my corpse, the first being scientific or medical use. Once my dead body is no longer of any use to me, it may as well be of some use to someone. Besides, I often enjoy rhinophytonecrophilia (nasal sex with dead plants).'		For necrophilia, it might be necessary to ask the next of kin for permission if the decedent's will did not authorize it. Necrophilia would be my second choice for what should be done with my corpse, the first being scientific or medical use. Once my dead body is no longer of any use to me, it may as well be of some use to someone. Besides, I often enjoy rhinophytonecrophilia (nasal sex with dead plants).}}

	*In 2006, he declared on his website:<ref>http://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party)</ref>~~, on the creation of the [[PNVD]] (a Dutch pro-paedophilia political party linked to [[Vereniging MARTIJN]]) in The Netherlands:~~		In 2006, he declared on his website, on the creation of the [[PNVD]] (a Dutch pro-paedophilia political party linked to [[Vereniging MARTIJN]]) in The Netherlands: "I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing."<ref>http://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party)</ref>

	~~'I am skeptical of~~ the ~~claim~~ that ~~voluntarily~~ pedophilia ~~harms~~ children. ~~The arguments~~ that it ~~causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren~~'~~t voluntary~~, ~~which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing~~.'		On January 4, 2013, he declared on his website, "There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children. Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue."<ref>http://www.stallman.org/archives/2012-nov-feb.html#04_January_2013_%28Pedophilia%29</ref>

	*On ~~January 4~~, 2013 ~~his~~ declared on his website <ref>http://~~www.~~stallman.org/archives/~~2012~~-~~nov~~-~~feb~~.html#~~04_January_2013_~~%~~28Pedophilia~~%29</ref>		On May 22, 2013, he declared on his website:<ref>http://stallman.org/archives/2013-mar-jun.html#22_May_2013_%28West_Virginia_proposes_to_protect_girls_by_punishing_them_for_sexting%29</ref>
	~~There~~ is ~~little evidence~~ to ~~justify~~ the ~~widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia~~ hurts ~~children~~.		{{cquote\|West Virginia proposes to 'protect' girls from the risk of embarrassment due to sexting by piling punishment on top. When sex is concerned, we see many proposals to punish those who are mistreated in one way or another. I think that this is just [[prudery]] at work — the talk about "helping" or "protecting" is just a disguise. If we really want to help people, we need to think about why they get hurt. The US has a ridiculous taboo on [[nudity]], and women who show their sexuality are sneered at. This is tied up with [[sexism]], [[mysogyny]], and [[religion]]. If a girl feels hurt due to publication of a nude photo of her, this [[stigma]] is probably why it hurts.

	Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue.		One way to destigmatize something is to get lots of people doing it. I made the suggestion that Facebook should require every user to provide a nude photo. This was a joke — no one should use Facebook! — but also serious. If lots of teenagers post nude photos, so that it becomes normal, the stigma will be gone.}}

	*On May 22, 2013 his declared on his website: <ref>http://stallman.org/archives/2013-mar-jun.html#22_May_2013_%28West_Virginia_proposes_to_protect_girls_by_punishing_them_for_sexting%29</ref>
	~~West Virginia proposes to "protect" girls from the risk of embarrassment due to sexting by piling punishment on top.~~

	When sex is concerned, we see many proposals to punish those who are mistreated in one way or another. I think that this is just prudery at work — the talk about "helping" or "protecting" is just a disguise.

	If we really want to help people, we need to think about why they get hurt. The US has a ridiculous taboo on nudity, and women who show their sexuality are sneered at. This is tied up with sexism, mysogyny, and religion. If a girl feels hurt due to publication of a nude photo of her, this stigma is probably why it hurts.

	One way to destigmatize something is to get lots of people doing it. I made the suggestion that Facebook should require every user to provide a nude photo. This was a joke — no one should use Facebook! — but also serious. If lots of teenagers post nude photos, so that it becomes normal, the stigma will be gone.

	== Notes et references ==		== Notes et references ==

Etenne at 11:47, 23 April 2015

2015-04-23T11:47:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 23 April 2015
Line 37:		Line 37:
	<references />		<references />
	[[Category:Online history\|Stallman Richard]]		[[Category:Online history\|Stallman Richard]]
			[[Category:People\|Stallman Richard]]

NotGNU at 01:29, 23 May 2013

2013-05-23T01:29:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:29, 23 May 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:
	'I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing.'		'I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing.'

	*On January 4, 2013 his declared on his website:<ref>http://www.stallman.org/archives/2012-nov-feb.html#04_January_2013_%28Pedophilia%29</ref>		*On January 4, 2013 his declared on his website <ref>http://www.stallman.org/archives/2012-nov-feb.html#04_January_2013_%28Pedophilia%29</ref>
	There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.		There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.

	Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue.		Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue.

			*On May 22, 2013 his declared on his website: <ref>http://stallman.org/archives/2013-mar-jun.html#22_May_2013_%28West_Virginia_proposes_to_protect_girls_by_punishing_them_for_sexting%29</ref>
			West Virginia proposes to "protect" girls from the risk of embarrassment due to sexting by piling punishment on top.

			When sex is concerned, we see many proposals to punish those who are mistreated in one way or another. I think that this is just prudery at work — the talk about "helping" or "protecting" is just a disguise.

			If we really want to help people, we need to think about why they get hurt. The US has a ridiculous taboo on nudity, and women who show their sexuality are sneered at. This is tied up with sexism, mysogyny, and religion. If a girl feels hurt due to publication of a nude photo of her, this stigma is probably why it hurts.

			One way to destigmatize something is to get lots of people doing it. I made the suggestion that Facebook should require every user to provide a nude photo. This was a joke — no one should use Facebook! — but also serious. If lots of teenagers post nude photos, so that it becomes normal, the stigma will be gone.

	== Notes et references ==		== Notes et references ==

NotGNU at 11:43, 30 April 2013

2013-04-30T11:43:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 30 April 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Richard Matthew Stallman (born March 16, 1953), often shortened to rms, is an American software freedom activist and computer programmer. In September 1983, he launched the GNU Project to create a free Unix-like operating system, and has been the project's lead architect and organizer. With the launch of the GNU Project, he initiated the free software movement; in October 1985 he founded the Free Software Foundation.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_stallman, last modified on 28 April 2011 at 11:19.</ref>		Richard Matthew Stallman (born March 16, 1953), often shortened to rms, is an American software freedom activist and computer programmer. In September 1983, he launched the GNU Project to create a free Unix-like operating system, and has been the project's lead architect and organizer. With the launch of the GNU Project, he initiated the free software movement; in October 1985 he founded the Free Software Foundation.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_stallman, last modified on 28 April 2011 at 11:19.</ref>

			He wrote the most of the GNU project philosophy: Show because he created the GNU project and a philosophy that all projects that are part of the GNU project should follow.

			He is interested in teach people to value their freedoms and fight for them. <ref>http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/rms-kol.html</ref> He says that child pornographers and terrorism are used as a excuse to take people freedom. <ref>http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/the-law-of-success-2.html</ref>

	==Quotes==		==Quotes==
Line 21:		Line 25:

	== Notes et references ==		== Notes et references ==
	~~The~~ above stems from an article on the french BoyWiki <ref>https://fr.boywiki.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman</ref>		Some of the above stems from an article on the french BoyWiki <ref>https://fr.boywiki.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman</ref>
	<references />		<references />
	[[Category:Online history\|Stallman Richard]]		[[Category:Online history\|Stallman Richard]]

Etenne at 12:41, 7 April 2013

2013-04-07T12:41:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 7 April 2013
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Some rules might be called for when these acts directly affect other people's interests. For incest, contraception could be mandatory to avoid risk of inbreeding. For prostitution, a license should be required to ensure prostitutes get regular medical check-ups, and they should have training and support in insisting on use of condoms. This will be an advance in public health, compared with the situation today. For necrophilia, it might be necessary to ask the next of kin for permission if the decedent's will did not authorize it. Necrophilia would be my second choice for what should be done with my corpse, the first being scientific or medical use. Once my dead body is no longer of any use to me, it may as well be of some use to someone. Besides, I often enjoy rhinophytonecrophilia (nasal sex with dead plants).'		Some rules might be called for when these acts directly affect other people's interests. For incest, contraception could be mandatory to avoid risk of inbreeding. For prostitution, a license should be required to ensure prostitutes get regular medical check-ups, and they should have training and support in insisting on use of condoms. This will be an advance in public health, compared with the situation today. For necrophilia, it might be necessary to ask the next of kin for permission if the decedent's will did not authorize it. Necrophilia would be my second choice for what should be done with my corpse, the first being scientific or medical use. Once my dead body is no longer of any use to me, it may as well be of some use to someone. Besides, I often enjoy rhinophytonecrophilia (nasal sex with dead plants).'

	*In 2006, he declared on his website:<ref>http://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party)</ref>, on the creation of the [[PNVD]] (a Dutch pro-paedophilia political party linked to [[Vereniging ~~Martijn~~]]) in The Netherlands:		*In 2006, he declared on his website:<ref>http://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party)</ref>, on the creation of the [[PNVD]] (a Dutch pro-paedophilia political party linked to [[Vereniging MARTIJN]]) in The Netherlands:

	'I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing.'		'I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing.'