Sexual predator - Revision history

Etenne at 15:02, 15 October 2016

2016-10-15T15:02:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 15 October 2016
Line 17:		Line 17:
	[[Category:Law]]		[[Category:Law]]
	[[Category:Sexuality]]		[[Category:Sexuality]]
	~~[[Category:Dictionary]]~~

User4: /* See also */

2016-05-15T09:40:27Z

User4: /* See also */

2016-05-15T09:29:54Z

User4: Ooops...

2016-05-15T09:28:40Z

Ooops...

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 15 May 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:

	==See also==		==See also==
	*[[Sexual predator]]
	*[[Psychobabble]]		*[[Psychobabble]]
	*[[List of deceptive and derogatory terminology directed at boylovers]]		*[[List of deceptive and derogatory terminology directed at boylovers]]

User4: /* See also */

2016-05-15T09:28:08Z

User4 at 08:00, 11 April 2016

2016-04-11T08:00:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:00, 11 April 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Being deemed a "sexual predator" qualifies otherwise harmless BoyLovers--those who have been (unjustly) imprisoned for engaging in sexual (and sometimes even ''non''-sexual) relationships with boys--to be commitment (for up to life) in mental institutions, by civil commitment procedures which do not allow the BoyLover the right to legal representation or the right to otherwise defend his interests. It is a grave violation of basic human rights.		Being deemed a "sexual predator" qualifies otherwise harmless BoyLovers--those who have been (unjustly) imprisoned for engaging in sexual (and sometimes even ''non''-sexual) relationships with boys--to be commitment (for up to life) in mental institutions, by civil commitment procedures which do not allow the BoyLover the right to legal representation or the right to otherwise defend his interests. It is a grave violation of basic human rights.

	The U.S. has ruled that "civil commitment" of "sexual predators" is not a violation of ~~the~~ U.S. constitutional rights.		The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that "civil commitment" of "sexual predators" who have finished serving a court-ordered term in prison is ''not'' a violation of U.S. citizen's constitutional rights: it is not "double jeopardy," "cruel and unusual punishment," nor does it violate the amendment prohibiting ex-post facto laws.

	==Reference==		==Reference==

User4 at 07:55, 11 April 2016

2016-04-11T07:55:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:55, 11 April 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	The U.S. has ruled that "civil commitment" of "sexual predators" is not a violation of the U.S. constitutional rights.		The U.S. has ruled that "civil commitment" of "sexual predators" is not a violation of the U.S. constitutional rights.

			==Reference==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

			==See also==
			*[[Psychobabble]]
			*[[List of deceptive and derogatory terminology directed at boylovers]]

			[[Category:Sexuality]]
			[[Category:Dictionary]]

User4: Created page with "A '''sexual predator''' is (allegedly) a person who "preys on" the weak and defenseless by sexually assaulting ("preying on") them. It is a neologism created by those wishing..."

2016-04-11T07:53:16Z

Created page with "A '''sexual predator''' is (allegedly) a person who "preys on" the weak and defenseless by sexually assaulting ("preying on") them. It is a neologism created by those wishing..."

New page

A '''sexual predator''' is (allegedly) a person who "preys on" the weak and defenseless by sexually assaulting ("preying on") them.

It is a neologism created by those wishing to monsterize<ref>Hopefully this term will become popular and be included in a forthcoming edition of the Oxford English dictionary, due to its appearance at BoyWiki. I mean, if it is good enough for Albert Ellis, it should be good enough for me... </ref> others who have sexual interests different from their own, as well as those who do truly physically attack and rape others.

Being deemed a "sexual predator" qualifies otherwise harmless BoyLovers--those who have been (unjustly) imprisoned for engaging in sexual (and sometimes even ''non''-sexual) relationships with boys--to be commitment (for up to life) in mental institutions, by civil commitment procedures which do not allow the BoyLover the right to legal representation or the right to otherwise defend his interests. It is a grave violation of basic human rights.

The U.S. has ruled that "civil commitment" of "sexual predators" is not a violation of the U.S. constitutional rights.

{{reflist}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 15 May 2016
Line 15:		Line 15:
	*[[List of deceptive and derogatory terminology directed at boylovers]]		*[[List of deceptive and derogatory terminology directed at boylovers]]

			[[Category:Law]]
	[[Category:Sexuality]]		[[Category:Sexuality]]
	[[Category:Dictionary]]		[[Category:Dictionary]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 15 May 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:

	==See also==		==See also==
			*[[Sexually violent predator]]
	*[[Psychobabble]]		*[[Psychobabble]]
	*[[List of deceptive and derogatory terminology directed at boylovers]]		*[[List of deceptive and derogatory terminology directed at boylovers]]