Talk:Azov Prosecutions and Amazon.com - Revision history

Etenne at 12:39, 1 May 2014

2014-05-01T12:39:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 1 May 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{ambox
			\| image = [[Image:Information icon.png\|50px]]
			\|info =Azov Prosecutions and Amazon.com was deleted for the following reason: It was not footnoted, ie, it made criminal allegations toward Amazon.com without documentation and was potentially libelous. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 13:59, 1 May 2014 (CEST)}}

	If Amazon.com became the target of such prosecutions, they have the resources to fight effectively.		If Amazon.com became the target of such prosecutions, they have the resources to fight effectively.

2014-03-27T00:29:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:29, 27 March 2014
Line 30:		Line 30:

	[[User:User4\|User4]] 00:16, 27 March 2014 (GMT)		[[User:User4\|User4]] 00:16, 27 March 2014 (GMT)

			---

	You really can't tell other writers on which topic they should write.... I figured that since you added this entry that it was a topic you were interested in writing about.		You really can't tell other writers on which topic they should write.... I figured that since you added this entry that it was a topic you were interested in writing about.

	--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] 00:25, 27 March 2014 (GMT)		--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] 00:25, 27 March 2014 (GMT)

			---

			"Why not have Will take a look at it?" is not telling other writers what to write about. It is just recommending that Will take a look at it. He may or may not be interested, but shouldn't he have the opportunity to make that decision for himself?

			[[User:User4\|User4]] 00:29, 27 March 2014 (GMT)

2014-03-27T00:25:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 27 March 2014
Line 30:		Line 30:

	[[User:User4\|User4]] 00:16, 27 March 2014 (GMT)		[[User:User4\|User4]] 00:16, 27 March 2014 (GMT)

			You really can't tell other writers on which topic they should write.... I figured that since you added this entry that it was a topic you were interested in writing about.

			--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] 00:25, 27 March 2014 (GMT)

2014-03-27T00:16:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 27 March 2014
Line 22:		Line 22:

	--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] 23:59, 26 March 2014 (GMT)		--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] 23:59, 26 March 2014 (GMT)

			---

			Why not have Will take a look at it? He is intimately familiar with the Azov cases, and all of their details. I think my time would be better spent on something other than becoming an expert on Azov cases when an expert already is "on our team".

			Don' you agree?

			[[User:User4\|User4]] 00:16, 27 March 2014 (GMT)

2014-03-26T23:59:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 26 March 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:

	[[User:User4\|User4]] 23:55, 26 March 2014 (GMT)		[[User:User4\|User4]] 23:55, 26 March 2014 (GMT)

			----

			I think this is a great topic and something you should pursue but it needs better documentation.
			See: [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view\|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]

			--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] 23:59, 26 March 2014 (GMT)

2014-03-26T23:55:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:55, 26 March 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	This article is opinion and needs to be referenced.		This article is opinion and needs to be referenced.
	--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] 23:45, 26 March 2014 (GMT)		--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] 23:45, 26 March 2014 (GMT)

			---

			I was instructed by you to <em>stay out</em> of the Azov pages. P~

			It would be fairly simple to reference, wouldn't it? I'll bet that Will could do it in his sleep.

			[[User:User4\|User4]] 23:55, 26 March 2014 (GMT)

2014-03-26T23:45:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:45, 26 March 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:User4\|User4]] 23:41, 26 March 2014 (GMT)		[[User:User4\|User4]] 23:41, 26 March 2014 (GMT)

			----

			This article is opinion and needs to be referenced.
			--[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] 23:45, 26 March 2014 (GMT)

2014-03-26T23:41:29Z

New page: If Amazon.com became the target of such prosecutions, they have the resources to fight effectively. ~~~~

New page

If Amazon.com became the target of such prosecutions, they have the resources to fight effectively.

[[User:User4|User4]] 23:41, 26 March 2014 (GMT)