https://www.boywiki.org/en/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AChild_advocate_%28dictionary%29 2026-05-04T14:59:51Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.45.3 https://www.boywiki.org/en/index.php?title=Talk:Child_advocate_(dictionary)&diff=9690&oldid=prev 2014-02-12T12:37:00Z

<p><a href="/en/Talk:Child_advocate" class="mw-redirect" title="Talk:Child advocate">Talk:Child advocate</a> moved to <a href="/en/Talk:Child_advocate_(dictionary)" title="Talk:Child advocate (dictionary)">Talk:Child advocate (dictionary)</a></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:37, 12 February 2014</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="4" class="diff-notice" lang="en"><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr> <!-- diff cache key boywiki?hen:diff:1.41:old-265:rev-9690 --> </table>

Etenne https://www.boywiki.org/en/index.php?title=Talk:Child_advocate_(dictionary)&diff=265&oldid=prev 2008-09-24T09:06:20Z

<p>New page: This article is turning out great. However I question the NPOVity of some of the latest changes. There&#039;s some very loaded terms like &quot;crusade&quot; and &quot;knee-jerk reactionaries&quot; in there. It al...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>This article is turning out great. However I question the NPOVity of some of the latest changes. There&#039;s some very loaded terms like &quot;crusade&quot; and &quot;knee-jerk reactionaries&quot; in there. It all depends on what BoyWiki means with a neutral point of view. It&#039;s a wiki for boylovers, not Johnny Straight-clown, so I guess in that respect all is well, but I think we should keep language in mind for the Dictionary and Encyclopedia categories. [[User:Clayboy|Clayboy]] 18:49, 14 September 2005 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * Yes, I think it should be neutral as well, since what we&#039;re defining has meaning outside the BL community. Although we &#039;&#039;should&#039;&#039; describe the POV of those BLs in reaction to the behavior of some CAs, that should only come &#039;&#039;after&#039;&#039; a neutral description of who they are. One problem I have with the common use of the term CA at BoyChat is that nobody seems to acknowledge its true definition - only its twisted use by what may be a minority of CAs for all I know. I think it should be OK to describe the bias of some BLs, but not write with such a bias. --[[User:The playful mind|The playful mind]] 01:11, 15 September 2005 (EDT)<br /> <br /> I changed a few more things that I hope made it more neutral. I also changed the masculine references to CAs (&quot;he&quot;) to something gender-neutral (&quot;they&quot;). --[[User:Ozymandias|Ozymandias]] 14 January 2006</div>

Keeper