Talk:For a Lost Soldier (film) - Revision history

Etenne: Etenne moved page Talk:For a Lost Soldier (Film) to Talk:For a Lost Soldier (film)

2015-03-07T10:14:30Z

Etenne moved page Talk:For a Lost Soldier (Film) to Talk:For a Lost Soldier (film)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, 7 March 2015
(No difference)

User4 at 05:30, 28 February 2015

2015-02-28T05:30:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 28 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I believe that the option for the book should be at ''the head'' of the article. Someone in a hurry may see that this article is about the ''film'' when they are only interested in the ''book'', and not take the time to read the whole article.		I ''still'' believe that the option for the book should be at ''the head'' of the article (even if it is now disambiguated, (have I created a new word?) as I just noticed.) Someone in a hurry may see that this article is about the ''film'' when they are only interested in the ''book'', and not take the time to read the whole article.

	Many people on the Internet are in a big hurry. They don't spend time on things that they consider to not be interesting -- the attention span of the average person today is rather short.		Many people on the Internet are in a big hurry. They don't spend time on things that they consider to not be interesting -- the attention span of the average person today is rather short.

User4: Created page with "I believe that the option for the book should be at ''the head'' of the article. Someone in a hurry may see that this article is about the ''film'' when they are only interest..."

2015-02-28T05:25:36Z

Created page with "I believe that the option for the book should be at ''the head'' of the article. Someone in a hurry may see that this article is about the ''film'' when they are only interest..."

New page

I believe that the option for the book should be at ''the head'' of the article. Someone in a hurry may see that this article is about the ''film'' when they are only interested in the ''book'', and not take the time to read the whole article.

Many people on the Internet are in a big hurry. They don't spend time on things that they consider to not be interesting -- the attention span of the average person today is rather short.

'''Wikipedia (and other wikis) use this style'''. Of course, we could choose to use a ''completely different'' style from all the other wikis.

But I suspect that doing so will not endear us to our visitors. Why take a chance on alienating the people who come here? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 05:25, 28 February 2015 (UTC)