Talk:Richard Yuill - Revision history

User4 at 18:53, 20 February 2015

2015-02-20T18:53:45Z

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
-(UTC)
+:My idea of "appropriate" regarding categories is that information should be made visible and easily accessible. Having a larger number of relevant categories makes it easier for people to find information. Different people think differently (so they say...), therefore allowances should be made for that. If an article is only in one or two categories, it is very likely to be overlooked by people who "''didn't think [what they were interested in] would be in such-and-such category.''"
-test:
+:Also, having articles listed in a larger number of categories provides a "buffet" of sorts - it introduces information to people who may not have realized the information would be interesting to them. It broadens people's understandings and perspective, wouldn't you agree?
-tildes
+[[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 18:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Etenne at 01:41, 19 February 2015

2015-02-19T01:41:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 19 February 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)		Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
	:Neither really, BoyWiki just has different categories then Newgon.wiki. It can go in multiple categories such as encyclopedia, research, people etc... whatever is appropriate. It just needs to correspond to this wiki. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 01:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)		:Neither really, BoyWiki just has different categories then Newgon.wiki. It can go in multiple categories such as encyclopedia, research, people etc... whatever is appropriate. It just needs to correspond to this wiki. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 01:20, 19 February 2015

			Also Newgon.wiki had a slightly different focus then BoyWiki.... even though there is a lot of crossover. It was primarily a child love wiki. BoyWik's mission is to record and preserve our own history, culture, and heritage as boylovers.


			(UTC)
	(test - ignore the following)		(test - ignore the following)

Etenne at 01:20, 19 February 2015

2015-02-19T01:20:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 19 February 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)		Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
			:Neither really, BoyWiki just has different categories then Newgon.wiki. It can go in multiple categories such as encyclopedia, research, people etc... whatever is appropriate. It just needs to correspond to this wiki. --[[User:Etenne\|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne\|talk]]) 01:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
	(test - ignore the following)		(test - ignore the following)

User4 at 01:19, 19 February 2015

2015-02-19T01:19:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 19 February 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	<nowiki>[[Category:People\|Yuill Richard]]</nowiki>		<nowiki>[[Category:People\|Yuill Richard]]</nowiki>

	Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think?		Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
	[[~~user4~~]]

	(ignore the following)		(test - ignore the following)

	test:		test:

User4 at 01:16, 19 February 2015

2015-02-19T01:16:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:16, 19 February 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	<nowiki>[[Category:People\|Yuill Richard]]</nowiki>		<nowiki>[[Category:People\|Yuill Richard]]</nowiki>

	Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[user4]]		Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think?
			[[user4]]

			(ignore the following)

			test:
			tildes

			one ~

			two ~~

			three [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]])

			four [[User:User4\|User4]] ([[User talk:User4\|talk]]) 01:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

			five 01:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

			six 01:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)~

			end test

User4 at 01:03, 19 February 2015

2015-02-19T01:03:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 19 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Etenne, I was wondering why, at Newgon.wiki, this article was include in the following categories:		Etenne, I was wondering why, at Newgon.wiki, this article was include in the following categories:

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category: Queer Theory]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Gay]][[Category:Sociological Theory]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Youth]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research on "Child Molesters"]][[Category:Research into effects on Children]][[Category:Research: Broader Perspectives]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: British]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:History & Events: Personal Scandals]][[Category:History & Events]][[Category:History & Events: British]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]		<nowiki>[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category: Queer Theory]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Gay]][[Category:Sociological Theory]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Youth]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research on "Child Molesters"]][[Category:Research into effects on Children]][[Category:Research: Broader Perspectives]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: British]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:History & Events: Personal Scandals]][[Category:History & Events]][[Category:History & Events: British]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]</nowiki>

	... while here at BW, this is the only category?		... while here at BW, this is the only category?

	[[Category:People\|Yuill Richard]]		<nowiki>[[Category:People\|Yuill Richard]]</nowiki>

	Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[user4]]		Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[user4]]

User4: Created page with "Etenne, I was wondering why, at Newgon.wiki, this article was include in the following categories: Category:Official EncyclopediaCategory: Queer TheoryCategory:Cens..."

2015-02-19T00:58:02Z

Created page with "Etenne, I was wondering why, at Newgon.wiki, this article was include in the following categories: Category:Official Encyclopedia Category: Queer TheoryCategory:Cens..."

New page

Etenne, I was wondering why, at Newgon.wiki, this article was include in the following categories:

[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category: Queer Theory]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Gay]][[Category:Sociological Theory]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Youth]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research on "Child Molesters"]][[Category:Research into effects on Children]][[Category:Research: Broader Perspectives]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: British]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:History & Events: Personal Scandals]][[Category:History & Events]][[Category:History & Events: British]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]

... while here at BW, this is the only category?

[[Category:People|Yuill Richard]]

Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[user4]]