Thoughtcrime - Revision history

User4: /* External links */

2016-05-15T08:32:03Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 15 May 2016
Line 29:		Line 29:

	==External links==		==External links==
			*Read online/download "The Perverse Law of Child Pornography by Amy Adler at this link:
			:http://www.keepandshare.com/doc18/view.php?id=9294&da=y

	{{stub}}		{{stub}}

User4: /* See also */

2016-05-15T08:31:08Z

Lysander: /* BoyLover "thought crimes" */

2016-05-01T13:38:28Z

BoyLover "thought crimes"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:38, 1 May 2016
Line 14:		Line 14:
	BoyLovers are being prosecuted for "thought crimes". A common argument for harsh punishment of [[child pornography]] offenders is that their thought patterns may put them at higher risk of having sex with children.		BoyLovers are being prosecuted for "thought crimes". A common argument for harsh punishment of [[child pornography]] offenders is that their thought patterns may put them at higher risk of having sex with children.

	Psychological evaluations are already being used as evidence for determining what sentences should be imposed on boylovers in the criminal justice system, and whether people who have not been convicted of any crime against minors should be allowed to raise their own children (see ''[[Santosky v. Kramer]]''). Advances in brain imaging and neuroscience may make it easier to identify a person's "dangerous" thoughtcrimes for forensic purposes.<ref>http://arstechnica.com/science/2011/02/thoughtcrime-the-ethics-of-neuroscience-and-criminality/</ref>		Psychological evaluations are already being used as evidence for determining what sentences should be imposed on boylovers in the criminal justice system, and whether people who have not been convicted of any crime against minors should be allowed to raise their own children (see ''[[Santosky v. Kramer]]'', allowing parental rights to be terminated if certain findings are made based on [[clear and convincing evidence]]). Advances in brain imaging and neuroscience may make it easier to identify a person's "dangerous" thoughtcrimes for forensic purposes.<ref>http://arstechnica.com/science/2011/02/thoughtcrime-the-ethics-of-neuroscience-and-criminality/</ref>

	The [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]] is essentially a statute book of forbidden thought patterns, promulgated by the quasi-legislative [[American Psychiatric Association]]. Having a mental disorder that poses a danger to oneself or others allows courts to take away the person's liberty without his having been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of having committed a crime, per ''[[Addington v. Texas]]''.		The [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]] is essentially a statute book of forbidden thought patterns, promulgated by the quasi-legislative [[American Psychiatric Association]]. Having a mental disorder that poses a danger to oneself or others allows courts to take away the person's liberty without his having been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of having committed a crime, per ''[[Addington v. Texas]]''.

Lysander: /* BoyLover "thought crimes" */

2016-05-01T13:37:45Z

BoyLover "thought crimes"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 1 May 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==BoyLover "thought crimes"==		==BoyLover "thought crimes"==
	BoyLovers are being prosecuted for "thought crimes". Psychological evaluations are already being used as evidence for determining what sentences should be imposed on boylovers in the criminal justice system, and whether people who have not been convicted of any crime against minors should be allowed to raise their own children (see ''[[Santosky v. Kramer]]''). Advances in brain imaging and neuroscience may make it easier to identify a person's "dangerous" thoughtcrimes for forensic purposes.<ref>http://arstechnica.com/science/2011/02/thoughtcrime-the-ethics-of-neuroscience-and-criminality/</ref>		BoyLovers are being prosecuted for "thought crimes". A common argument for harsh punishment of [[child pornography]] offenders is that their thought patterns may put them at higher risk of having sex with children.

			Psychological evaluations are already being used as evidence for determining what sentences should be imposed on boylovers in the criminal justice system, and whether people who have not been convicted of any crime against minors should be allowed to raise their own children (see ''[[Santosky v. Kramer]]''). Advances in brain imaging and neuroscience may make it easier to identify a person's "dangerous" thoughtcrimes for forensic purposes.<ref>http://arstechnica.com/science/2011/02/thoughtcrime-the-ethics-of-neuroscience-and-criminality/</ref>

	The [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]] is essentially a statute book of forbidden thought patterns, promulgated by the quasi-legislative [[American Psychiatric Association]]. Having a mental disorder that poses a danger to oneself or others allows courts to take away the person's liberty without his having been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of having committed a crime, per ''[[Addington v. Texas]]''.		The [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]] is essentially a statute book of forbidden thought patterns, promulgated by the quasi-legislative [[American Psychiatric Association]]. Having a mental disorder that poses a danger to oneself or others allows courts to take away the person's liberty without his having been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of having committed a crime, per ''[[Addington v. Texas]]''.

Lysander at 13:36, 1 May 2016

2016-05-01T13:36:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 1 May 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:

	==BoyLover "thought crimes"==		==BoyLover "thought crimes"==
	BoyLovers are being prosecuted for "thought crimes".		BoyLovers are being prosecuted for "thought crimes". Psychological evaluations are already being used as evidence for determining what sentences should be imposed on boylovers in the criminal justice system, and whether people who have not been convicted of any crime against minors should be allowed to raise their own children (see ''[[Santosky v. Kramer]]''). Advances in brain imaging and neuroscience may make it easier to identify a person's "dangerous" thoughtcrimes for forensic purposes.<ref>http://arstechnica.com/science/2011/02/thoughtcrime-the-ethics-of-neuroscience-and-criminality/</ref>

			The [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]] is essentially a statute book of forbidden thought patterns, promulgated by the quasi-legislative [[American Psychiatric Association]]. Having a mental disorder that poses a danger to oneself or others allows courts to take away the person's liberty without his having been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of having committed a crime, per ''[[Addington v. Texas]]''.

	==References==		==References==

Lysander at 13:26, 1 May 2016

2016-05-01T13:26:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 1 May 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~#REDIRECT [[Thoughtcrime~~ (~~dictionary~~)]]		A '''thoughtcrime''' is an occurrence or instance of controversial or socially unacceptable thoughts. The term is also used to describe some theological concepts such as disbelief or idolatry, <ref>Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy: - Volume 3 - Page 107, David Lewis - 2000</ref> or a rejection of strong philosophical or social principles. <ref> Evidence, Policy and Practice: Critical Perspectives in Health and Social Care, Jon Glasby - 2011, p 22</ref>

			The term was popularized in the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell, wherein thoughtcrime is the criminal act of holding unspoken beliefs or doubts that oppose or question the ruling party. In the book, the government attempts to control not only the speech and actions, but also the thoughts of its subjects. To entertain unacceptable thoughts is known as crimethink in Newspeak, the ideologically purified dialect of the party. <ref> Orwell, George; Rovere, Richard Halworth (1984) [1956], The Orwell Reader: Fiction, Essays, and Reportage, San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, p. 409, ISBN 0-15-670176-6.</ref> "Crimestop" is a way to avoid crimethink by immediately purging dangerous thoughts from the mind.

			==Summary==

			Some modern publishers have described people who were being prosecuted and burned at the stake for heresy in various Abrahamic religions, as being victims of thoughtcrime laws. Such victims of thoughtcrime laws would sometimes be offered the chance to repent for their thoughtcrimes. <ref>Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare, Stephen Greenblatt - 2012</ref>

			People were similarly executed, or imprisoned in concentration camps, for thoughtcrime during the 20th century in totalitarian regimes, such as Stalinist USSR, Maoist China, and Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge.

			The word is also used in instances where people are prevented from voicing opinions which are politically incorrect or which others may potentially be offended by. This prevention may affect speech, writing, and other forms of expression. The punishment of apostasy in sharia law is sometimes interpreted as being the death penalty, which has been described as a thoughtcrime. <ref>Critique: Review of the Department of State's Country Reports on Human Rights Practices- Page 330, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, 1992</ref>

			==BoyLover "thought crimes"==
			BoyLovers are being prosecuted for "thought crimes".


			==References==
			{{reflist}}

			==See also==


			==External links==

			{{stub}}

Etenne: Redirected page to Thoughtcrime (dictionary)

2016-01-30T14:47:20Z

Redirected page to Thoughtcrime (dictionary)

New page

#REDIRECT [[Thoughtcrime (dictionary)]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 15 May 2016
Line 22:		Line 22:

	==See also==		==See also==
			*[[Thoughtcrime (dictionary)]]
			*[[Psychiatry]]
			*[[psychobabble]]
			*[[When "making friends" becomes a "crime"!]]
			*[[Child pornography]]

	==External links==		==External links==

	{{stub}}		{{stub}}