User4 at 16:09, 21 March 2016

2016-03-21T16:09:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 21 March 2016
Line 13:		Line 13:
	See, it's all because the ''palms of boy's hands'' are not considered to be "sexual," but, of course, the boys' penises ''are'' considered sexual--and, therefore, to be dirty, nasty, shameful, and the rightful subject of societies opprobrium and condemnation. All this, of course, to "protect the innocence" of the boys.		See, it's all because the ''palms of boy's hands'' are not considered to be "sexual," but, of course, the boys' penises ''are'' considered sexual--and, therefore, to be dirty, nasty, shameful, and the rightful subject of societies opprobrium and condemnation. All this, of course, to "protect the innocence" of the boys.

	Thank god humans don't have sex by shaking hands! If they did, men would be considered to be raping of every other man and boy they ~~met~~!		Thank god humans don't have sex by shaking hands! If they did, men would be considered to be raping every other man and boy they greet!

	<small>''Sheesh!''</small>		<small>''Sheesh!''</small>

User4: Why do we need to talk about the sexual activity that men engage in with boys? This should give you some idea...

2016-03-21T13:27:25Z

Why do we need to talk about the sexual activity that men engage in with boys? This should give you some idea...

New page

A '''pennyphile''' is a male who engages in pennyphilia with prepubescent boys. The pennyphile grooms the boys, sometimes for long periods of time--and often befriends the mother of the boy in an attempt to gain the mother's trust--which will then allow the male to pursue his pennyphilic interests in the boy.

Pennyphilic activity consists of the men placing pennies in the palms of the hands of their innocent young child victims--including little boys as young as 2 years old!

But society is little aware of the existence of pennyphiles, as their behavior seems (on the surface) so innocent. And perhaps it ''is'' innocent.

But if pennyphiles, instead, wanted to put pennies onto the ''penises'' of little boys, then society would become outraged. And, surely enough, laws would be passed against "monster pennyphiles," and soon the rabid anti-penniests would (falsely) accuse the pennyphiles of wanting to ''insert'' the pennies ''into the anuses of the boys!'' Though this would be factually incorrect, the public would accept these (false) claims without question, and the hysterical reactions of the public (and the incarceration of pennyphiles) would grow exponentially.

Just as what happened when the [[antisexuals]] and [[homophobia|homophobes]] began to (falsely) accuse BoyLovers (meaning ''true'' pedophiles) of wanting to insert their ''penises'' into the ''anuses'' of little boys, which, of course, is almost always untrue.

And, the irony of it all is that with ''pennyphiles'' we're just talking about ''pennies being given to boys by men''...

See, it's all because the ''palms of boy's hands'' are not considered to be "sexual," but, of course, the boys' penises ''are'' considered sexual--and, therefore, to be dirty, nasty, shameful, and the rightful subject of societies opprobrium and condemnation. All this, of course, to "protect the innocence" of the boys.

Thank god humans don't have sex by shaking hands! If they did, men would be considered to be raping of every other man and boy they met!

<small>''Sheesh!''</small>

USER4/DRAFT/Pennyphile - Revision history

User4 at 16:09, 21 March 2016

User4: Why do we need to talk about the sexual activity that men engage in with boys? This should give you some idea...