User4/draft/BoyLovers and boys--the "basic incompatibility" - Revision history

User4 at 21:11, 17 April 2016

2016-04-17T21:11:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 17 April 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	This belief began to change in the 70s and 80s of the past century, due to the influence--and selfish political activities--of certain feminists. These feminists (wrongly) asserted that it was somehow [[inappropriate]] for a man to want to become part of a boy's life, even though this new--and very damaging--set of beliefs was contrary to hundreds-of-thousands of years of human evolution.		This belief began to change in the 70s and 80s of the past century, due to the influence--and selfish political activities--of certain feminists. These feminists (wrongly) asserted that it was somehow [[inappropriate]] for a man to want to become part of a boy's life, even though this new--and very damaging--set of beliefs was contrary to hundreds-of-thousands of years of human evolution.

	Today, young boylovers have often "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid drunk the Kool-aid]" (Wikipedia link) and believe that they have nothing to offer to boys. They believe they have nothing in common with boys. They believe that their lives and boys' lives are "compartmentalized", and therefore their only interest in boys would/could be for the BoyLover'r own (so-called) "sexual gratification".		Today, young boylovers have often "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid drunk the Kool-aid]" (Wikipedia link) and believe that they have nothing to offer to boys. They believe they have nothing in common with boys. They believe that their lives and boys' lives are "compartmentalized", and therefore their only interest in boys would/could be for the BoyLover's own (so-called) "sexual gratification".

	==See also==		==See also==

User4 at 19:03, 17 April 2016

2016-04-17T19:03:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 17 April 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Many (falsely) claim ~~these days~~ that there is a "basic incompatibility" between the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers. They (incorrectly) claim that the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers have nothing in common.		Many these days (falsely) claim that there is a "basic incompatibility" between the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers. They (incorrectly) claim that the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers have nothing in common.

	Historically, the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers (and other men) have overlapped. In the past there never was any "incompatibility"--in fact, there was a ''definite compatibility''--boys were simply considered to be developing and/or undeveloped men, and boys ''needed'' men to help them to grow up to be successful human males. The lives of boys and BoyLovers ''complemented'' each other.		Historically, the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers (and other men) have overlapped. In the past there never was any "incompatibility"--in fact, there was a ''definite compatibility''--boys were simply considered to be developing and/or undeveloped men, and boys ''needed'' men to help them to grow up to be successful human males. The lives of boys and BoyLovers ''complemented'' each other.
Line 5:		Line 5:
	This belief began to change in the 70s and 80s of the past century, due to the influence--and selfish political activities--of certain feminists. These feminists (wrongly) asserted that it was somehow [[inappropriate]] for a man to want to become part of a boy's life, even though this new--and very damaging--set of beliefs was contrary to hundreds-of-thousands of years of human evolution.		This belief began to change in the 70s and 80s of the past century, due to the influence--and selfish political activities--of certain feminists. These feminists (wrongly) asserted that it was somehow [[inappropriate]] for a man to want to become part of a boy's life, even though this new--and very damaging--set of beliefs was contrary to hundreds-of-thousands of years of human evolution.

	Today, young boylovers have often "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid drunk the Kool-aid]" (Wikipedia link) and believe that they have nothing to offer to boys. They ~~believer~~ they have nothing in common with boys. They believe that their lives and boys' lives are "compartmentalized", and therefore their only interest in boys would/could be for the BoyLover'r own (so-called) "sexual gratification".		Today, young boylovers have often "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid drunk the Kool-aid]" (Wikipedia link) and believe that they have nothing to offer to boys. They believe they have nothing in common with boys. They believe that their lives and boys' lives are "compartmentalized", and therefore their only interest in boys would/could be for the BoyLover'r own (so-called) "sexual gratification".

	==See also==		==See also==

User4: Created page with "Many (falsely) claim these days that there is a "basic incompatibility" between the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers. They (incorrectly) claim that the lives of boys a..."

2016-04-17T18:59:21Z

Created page with "Many (falsely) claim these days that there is a "basic incompatibility" between the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers. They (incorrectly) claim that the lives of boys a..."

New page

Many (falsely) claim these days that there is a "basic incompatibility" between the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers. They (incorrectly) claim that the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers have nothing in common.

Historically, the lives of boys and the lives of BoyLovers (and other men) have overlapped. In the past there never was any "incompatibility"--in fact, there was a ''definite compatibility''--boys were simply considered to be developing and/or undeveloped men, and boys ''needed'' men to help them to grow up to be successful human males. The lives of boys and BoyLovers ''complemented'' each other.

This belief began to change in the 70s and 80s of the past century, due to the influence--and selfish political activities--of certain feminists. These feminists (wrongly) asserted that it was somehow [[inappropriate]] for a man to want to become part of a boy's life, even though this new--and very damaging--set of beliefs was contrary to hundreds-of-thousands of years of human evolution.

Today, young boylovers have often "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid drunk the Kool-aid]" (Wikipedia link) and believe that they have nothing to offer to boys. They believer they have nothing in common with boys. They believe that their lives and boys' lives are "compartmentalized", and therefore their only interest in boys would/could be for the BoyLover'r own (so-called) "sexual gratification".

==See also==
*[[Sex Panic and the Punitive State (book)]]
*[[Boys on their contacts with men: a study of sexually expressed friendships (book)]]
*[[The War Against Boys (book)]] ARTICLE NEEDS TO BE ADDED

==External links==
*Read/Download the book, ''The War Against Boys- How Misguided Policies are Harming Our Young Men'' (2013 revised/updated edition) by Christina Hoff Sommers
:http://www.keepandshare.com/doc18/8688/the-war-against-boys-how-misguided-policies-are-harming-our-young-men-2013-christina-hoff-sommers-p?da=y

:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid
[[Category:Sexuality]]
[[Category:Psychology]]

{{stub}}