Voodoo Molestation - Revision history

Etenne at 19:18, 27 June 2022

2022-06-27T19:18:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 27 June 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{CL}}		{{CL}}
	In 1994, the US Congress passed the ''Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children Act'', which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault, domestic violence and child pornography. The law called for full restitution — but it did not specify who should pay what....		In 1994, the US Congress passed the ''Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children Act'', which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault, domestic violence and child pornography. The law called for full restitution — but it did not specify who should pay what....
	~~[[File:Eo-scale of justice.gif\|right]]~~

	==Amy==		==Amy==

Etenne at 19:17, 27 June 2022

2022-06-27T19:17:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 27 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Quotation\|'''Voodoo''' describes a set of spiritual folkways which originated from African traditions. Practitioners of Voodoo believe in “sympathetic magic”. Sympathetic magic principles state a powerful link exists between entities that are similar in appearance or come into contact with each other. Items such as photographs, nail clippings, hair and other objects may be used to create an “image” of another person. This “image” may be used to cast a curse or spell. For this reason, there are some practitioners of Voodoo who are cautious of photographs, as they are powerful items capable of harm.<ref name=parabolic>{{cite web\|url=http://parabolicevidence.com/occult/the-religious-belief-that-a-photograph-can-steal-a-soul/ \|title=The religious belief that a photograph can steal a soul\|date= \|accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> Magic and superstition have surrounded photography from the beginning. Because of the way it captured the image, especially of living people, the camera was widely believed to cause death or illness or to steal the soul.<ref name=Oxford>{{cite web\|url=http://www.answers.com/topic/magic-and-superstition#ixzz306XI5JMN \|title=Oxford Companion to the Photograph:magic and superstition\| first=Elizabeth \| last= Edwards\|\|publisher= Oxford University Press \|date= \|accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> While some cultures still believe that photography can steal your soul, most people in these cultures today allow their photograph to be taken, however infants are protected. It is still believed the souls of infants are fragile and are susceptible to leaving the body.<ref>http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/8380/did-some-cultures-believe-that-photography-can-steal-your-soul</ref>}}		{{Quotation\|'''Voodoo''' describes a set of spiritual folkways which originated from African traditions. Practitioners of Voodoo believe in “sympathetic magic”. Sympathetic magic principles state a powerful link exists between entities that are similar in appearance or come into contact with each other. Items such as photographs, nail clippings, hair and other objects may be used to create an “image” of another person. This “image” may be used to cast a curse or spell. For this reason, there are some practitioners of Voodoo who are cautious of photographs, as they are powerful items capable of harm.<ref name=parabolic>{{cite web\|url=http://parabolicevidence.com/occult/the-religious-belief-that-a-photograph-can-steal-a-soul/ \|title=The religious belief that a photograph can steal a soul\|date= \|accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> Magic and superstition have surrounded photography from the beginning. Because of the way it captured the image, especially of living people, the camera was widely believed to cause death or illness or to steal the soul.<ref name=Oxford>{{cite web\|url=http://www.answers.com/topic/magic-and-superstition#ixzz306XI5JMN \|title=Oxford Companion to the Photograph:magic and superstition\| first=Elizabeth \| last= Edwards\|\|publisher= Oxford University Press \|date= \|accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> While some cultures still believe that photography can steal your soul, most people in these cultures today allow their photograph to be taken, however infants are protected. It is still believed the souls of infants are fragile and are susceptible to leaving the body.<ref>http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/8380/did-some-cultures-believe-that-photography-can-steal-your-soul</ref>}}

			{{CL}}
	In 1994, the US Congress passed the ''Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children Act'', which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault, domestic violence and child pornography. The law called for full restitution — but it did not specify who should pay what....		In 1994, the US Congress passed the ''Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children Act'', which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault, domestic violence and child pornography. The law called for full restitution — but it did not specify who should pay what....
	[[File:Eo-scale of justice.gif\|right]]		[[File:Eo-scale of justice.gif\|right]]

Etenne: Etenne moved page Harm to victims of child abuse from the viewing of the resulting child pornography to Voodoo Molestation

2021-11-18T23:33:13Z

Etenne moved page Harm to victims of child abuse from the viewing of the resulting child pornography to Voodoo Molestation

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:33, 18 November 2021
(No difference)

Etenne at 23:31, 18 November 2021

2021-11-18T23:31:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 18 November 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~mergefrom~~\|~~Child pornography viewing~~ as a ~~violation against~~ the ~~child's dignity~~}}		{{Quotation\|'''Voodoo''' describes a set of spiritual folkways which originated from African traditions. Practitioners of Voodoo believe in “sympathetic magic”. Sympathetic magic principles state a powerful link exists between entities that are similar in appearance or come into contact with each other. Items such as photographs, nail clippings, hair and other objects may be used to create an “image” of another person. This “image” may be used to cast a curse or spell. For this reason, there are some practitioners of Voodoo who are cautious of photographs, as they are powerful items capable of harm.<ref name=parabolic>{{cite web\|url=http://parabolicevidence.com/occult/the-religious-belief-that-a-photograph-can-steal-a-soul/ \|title=The religious belief that a photograph can steal a soul\|date= \|accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> Magic and superstition have surrounded photography from the beginning. Because of the way it captured the image, especially of living people, the camera was widely believed to cause death or illness or to steal the soul.<ref name=Oxford>{{cite web\|url=http://www.answers.com/topic/magic-and-superstition#ixzz306XI5JMN \|title=Oxford Companion to the Photograph:magic and superstition\| first=Elizabeth \| last= Edwards\|\|publisher= Oxford University Press \|date= \|accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> While some cultures still believe that photography can steal your soul, most people in these cultures today allow their photograph to be taken, however infants are protected. It is still believed the souls of infants are fragile and are susceptible to leaving the body.<ref>http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/8380/did-some-cultures-believe-that-photography-can-steal-your-soul</ref>}}
	~~In 1994~~, the ~~US Congress passed~~ the ~~''Sexual Exploitation~~ and ~~Other Abuse of Children Act''~~, ~~which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault~~, ~~domestic violence~~ and ~~child pornography~~. ~~The law called for full restitution — but it~~ did ~~not specify who should pay what.~~

	It has been argued, "If the viewing of child pornography is a violent crime, then didn't the law enforcement officers who found this stuff on the defendant's computer, and the judge and the jury who had an opportunity to examine the evidence against him engage in a violent crime?"<ref>http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2011/11/florida-defendant-gets-lwop-sentence-for-mere-possession-of-lots-of-kiddie-porn.html</ref>

	~~==Libertarian view==~~		In 1994, the US Congress passed the ''Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children Act'', which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault, domestic violence and child pornography. The law called for full restitution — but it did not specify who should pay what....
	~~Jesse Walker argues:~~		[[File:Eo-scale of justice.gif\|right]]
	~~{{cquote\|If the issue is privacy, shame~~, ~~and being haunted by ineradicable images, wouldn’t~~ the ~~same argument apply to~~ the ~~abused prisoners photographed at Abu Ghraib? To hostages filmed by their captors~~ and ~~aired on the news? To anyone humiliated in front~~ of ~~a camera? Should an inadvertent Internet celebrity~~, ~~deeply embarrassed that people are chuckling at a clip of his light-saber dance, have standing to sue the viewers?~~

	~~That last example might seem absurd~~, but it ~~actually veers close to the pornography debate. Because the child porn laws set the age of maturity so high, they cover~~ not ~~just the victims of coercion but exhibitionists~~ who ~~voluntarily put photographs~~ of ~~themselves online~~.}}

	==Amy==		==Amy==
Line 15:		Line 10:
	===Doyle Paroline===		===Doyle Paroline===

	Doyle Randall Paroline, who possessed just two images of the 280 or more illegal images available on the internet was sentenced in 2009 to two years in prison was found liable by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit for the full amount of the $3.4 million in restitution Amy has claimed. The 5th Circuit said it was up to Paroline—not Amy—to find the other men who could also be on the hook for restitution and go after them for contributions<ref name=Slate >{{cite web\|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/12/child_pornography_restitution_and_the_violence_against_women_act_the_supreme.html \|title=Paying Amy\| first=Emily\| last= Bazelon\|\|publisher= The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company \|date=Dec. 4 2013 5:24 PM \|accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> for their part in damaging Amy's soul.		Doyle Randall Paroline, who possessed just two images of the 280 or more illegal images available on the internet was sentenced in 2009 to two years in prison was found liable by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit for the full amount of the $3.4 million in restitution Amy has claimed. The 5th Circuit said it was up to Paroline—not Amy—to find the other men who could also be on the hook for restitution and go after them for contributions<ref name=Slate >{{cite web\|url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/12/child_pornography_restitution_and_the_violence_against_women_act_the_supreme.html \|title=Paying Amy\| first=Emily\| last= Bazelon\|\|publisher= The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company \|date=Dec. 4 2013 5:24 PM \|accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> for their part in damaging Amy's soul.

	The majority wrote, "It is common ground that the victim suffers continuing and grievous harm as a result of her knowledge that a large, indeterminate number of individuals have viewed and will in the future view images of the sexual abuse she endured. . . . Harms of this sort are a major reason why child pornography is outlawed."<ref>{{cite web\|url=http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/12-8561\|title=Paroline v. United States\|publisher=Cornell\|date=23 April 2014}}</ref> The [[Amy and Vicky Child Pornography Victim Restitution Improvement Act]] was passed by the U.S. Senate in response to the court's ruling.

	===Michael Wright===		===Michael Wright===
Line 71:		Line 64:

	Ordered to pay compensation http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/24/court-orders-former-viagra-executive-to-pay-200000-to-woman-photographed-as-a-child-while-being-sexually-abused/		Ordered to pay compensation http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/24/court-orders-former-viagra-executive-to-pay-200000-to-woman-photographed-as-a-child-while-being-sexually-abused/
	~~==See also==~~
	*[[Voodoo molestation (dictionary)]]

	==References==		==References==
Line 82:		Line 73:
	*[http://www.boychat.org/messages/1362937.htm Ethel Quayle spirit porn]		*[http://www.boychat.org/messages/1362937.htm Ethel Quayle spirit porn]

	~~{{Navbox child porn justifications}}~~
	[[Category:Law]]		[[Category:Law]]

Etenne: /* Similar cases */

2015-05-30T13:33:51Z

Similar cases

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:33, 30 May 2015
Line 71:		Line 71:

	Ordered to pay compensation http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/24/court-orders-former-viagra-executive-to-pay-200000-to-woman-photographed-as-a-child-while-being-sexually-abused/		Ordered to pay compensation http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/24/court-orders-former-viagra-executive-to-pay-200000-to-woman-photographed-as-a-child-while-being-sexually-abused/
			==See also==
			*[[Voodoo molestation (dictionary)]]

	==References==		==References==

Lysander at 00:38, 24 May 2015

2015-05-24T00:38:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 24 May 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{mergefrom\|Child pornography viewing as a violation against the child's dignity}}		{{mergefrom\|Child pornography viewing as a violation against the child's dignity}}
	In 1994, the US Congress passed the ''Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children Act'', which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault, domestic violence and child pornography. The law called for full restitution — but it did not specify who should pay what.		In 1994, the US Congress passed the ''Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children Act'', which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault, domestic violence and child pornography. The law called for full restitution — but it did not specify who should pay what.

			It has been argued, "If the viewing of child pornography is a violent crime, then didn't the law enforcement officers who found this stuff on the defendant's computer, and the judge and the jury who had an opportunity to examine the evidence against him engage in a violent crime?"<ref>http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2011/11/florida-defendant-gets-lwop-sentence-for-mere-possession-of-lots-of-kiddie-porn.html</ref>

	==Libertarian view==		==Libertarian view==

Lysander: Lysander moved page Alleged harm to victims of child abuse from the viewing of the resulting child pornography to Harm to victims of child abuse from the viewing of the resulting child pornography over redirect

2015-05-18T16:15:41Z

Lysander moved page Alleged harm to victims of child abuse from the viewing of the resulting child pornography to Harm to victims of child abuse from the viewing of the resulting child pornography over redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:15, 18 May 2015
(No difference)

Lysander: Lysander moved page Harm to victims of child abuse from the viewing of the resulting child pornography to Alleged harm to victims of child abuse from the viewing of the resulting child pornography

2015-05-16T14:49:37Z

Lysander moved page Harm to victims of child abuse from the viewing of the resulting child pornography to Alleged harm to victims of child abuse from the viewing of the resulting child pornography

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:49, 16 May 2015
(No difference)

Lysander at 14:48, 16 May 2015

2015-05-16T14:48:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 16 May 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{mergefrom\|Child pornography viewing as a violation against the child's dignity}}		{{mergefrom\|Child pornography viewing as a violation against the child's dignity}}
			In 1994, the US Congress passed the ''Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children Act'', which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault, domestic violence and child pornography. The law called for full restitution — but it did not specify who should pay what.

			==Libertarian view==
			Jesse Walker argues:
			{{cquote\|If the issue is privacy, shame, and being haunted by ineradicable images, wouldn’t the same argument apply to the abused prisoners photographed at Abu Ghraib? To hostages filmed by their captors and aired on the news? To anyone humiliated in front of a camera? Should an inadvertent Internet celebrity, deeply embarrassed that people are chuckling at a clip of his light-saber dance, have standing to sue the viewers?

			That last example might seem absurd, but it actually veers close to the pornography debate. Because the child porn laws set the age of maturity so high, they cover not just the victims of coercion but exhibitionists who voluntarily put photographs of themselves online.}}
	~~In 1994~~, the ~~US Congress passed~~ the ~~''Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse~~ of ~~Children Act''~~, ~~which established penalties and restitution for sexual assault, domestic violence and child pornography. The law called for full restitution —~~ but ~~it did not specify~~ who ~~should pay what....~~
	~~[[File:Eo-scale~~ of ~~justice~~.~~gif\|right]]~~

	==Amy==		==Amy==

Etenne at 12:13, 2 April 2015

2015-04-02T12:13:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 2 April 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{mergefrom\|Child pornography viewing as a violation against the child's dignity}}		{{mergefrom\|Child pornography viewing as a violation against the child's dignity}}
	{{Quotation\|'''Voodoo''' describes a set of spiritual folkways which originated from African traditions. Practitioners of Voodoo believe in “sympathetic magic”. Sympathetic magic principles state a powerful link exists between entities that are similar in appearance or come into contact with each other. Items such as photographs, nail clippings, hair and other objects may be used to create an “image” of another person. This “image” may be used to cast a curse or spell. For this reason, there are some practitioners of Voodoo who are cautious of photographs, as they are powerful items capable of harm.<ref name=parabolic>{{cite web\|url=https://parabolicevidence.wordpress.com/occult/the-religious-belief-that-a-photograph-can-steal-a-soul/ \|title=The religious belief that a photograph can steal a soul\|date= \|accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> Magic and superstition have surrounded photography from the beginning. Because of the way it captured the image, especially of living people, the camera was widely believed to cause death or illness or to steal the soul.<ref name=Oxford>{{cite web\|url=http://www.answers.com/topic/magic-and-superstition#ixzz306XI5JMN \|title=Oxford Companion to the Photograph:magic and superstition\| first=Elizabeth \| last= Edwards\|\|publisher= Oxford University Press \|date= \|accessdate=April 27, 2014}}</ref> While some cultures still believe that photography can steal your soul, most people in these cultures today allow their photograph to be taken, however infants are protected. It is still believed the souls of infants are fragile and are susceptible to leaving the body.<ref>http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/8380/did-some-cultures-believe-that-photography-can-steal-your-soul</ref>}}