Difference between revisions of "Talk:Computer security"

From BoyWiki
m
(added point 4, and thank you ettene for erasing agoradrugs link i think it was the right call it was placed there in good faith but hard drugs are sickening and being associated with any of that in the slightest can not be good)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
2-I also would like to delete the link to AgoraDrugs, not only I don't think it is appropiate to have a link to a website/newsletter promoting hard drugs like cocaine and heroin, the site has not been updated since 2015 so it is out of date. (Note: I deleted the link as I have to ensure BoyWiki's security - [[Etenne]])  
 
2-I also would like to delete the link to AgoraDrugs, not only I don't think it is appropiate to have a link to a website/newsletter promoting hard drugs like cocaine and heroin, the site has not been updated since 2015 so it is out of date. (Note: I deleted the link as I have to ensure BoyWiki's security - [[Etenne]])  
  
But I don't wish to upset anybody so I will wait a few days to see if anybody here raises any objection before erasing that link because I know some of you have contributed far more than me to boywiki and it would be wrong for me to come along and start deleting links from others, but seriously, a link to newsletter about how to get hard drugs on the darkweb?? I don't know who placed it there but please reconsider, we are talking about serious stuff here and boywiki is under antis and law enforcement watch, the last thing we need is giving the impression that any illegal behaviour is encouraged or assisted
+
3- I noticed annotations in the wiki saying "Not true of all browsers" or "not true" and "spelling?", I would like to suggest that instead of annotations the text is fixed and the annotations is made here in the talk page instead of the main page.
  
3- I noticed annotations in the wiki saying "Not true of all browsers" or "not true" and "spelling?", I would like to suggest that instead of annotations the text is fixed and the annotations is made here in the talk page instead of the main page.
+
4- I see lots of references about law enforcement in this page, I would like to suggest this is toned down because it can give the impression to law enforcement members reading the Wiki that we are assisting crime, when the mission of boywiki privacy pages are assisting people in privacy to avoid discrimination and hackers and because privacy is a human right.
  
I have fixed all spelling annotations I could find, thank you for highlighting them, you were 100% correct, spelling was wrong, but if instead of editing the text to add there is a spelling mistake, the mistake is fixed I don't think anybody should get upset, it takes around the same work
+
Just my opinion, when writing something one should assume 100% that law enforcement is reading it too and ask himself, could this be misconstrued to look like we are assisting crime? And if it looks like you are doing that, best change the wording because press and cops love to make up stories that don't exist and frame people if they are suspected pedophiles, they sure as hell would love to have a reason to raid freespirits if they could find one just because of their hatred for pedosexuals.
  
--[[User:Eskimo|Eskimo]] ([[User talk:Eskimo|talk]]) 16:06, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
+
--[[User:Eskimo|Eskimo]] ([[User talk:Eskimo|talk]]) 16:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
  
  

Revision as of 16:43, 18 March 2016

Should User4's last edit be put under a "security methods" section?


1- I agree with you, User4 information is extremely helpful but it should not be placed under "External links", it should be placed somewhere else.

2-I also would like to delete the link to AgoraDrugs, not only I don't think it is appropiate to have a link to a website/newsletter promoting hard drugs like cocaine and heroin, the site has not been updated since 2015 so it is out of date. (Note: I deleted the link as I have to ensure BoyWiki's security - Etenne)

3- I noticed annotations in the wiki saying "Not true of all browsers" or "not true" and "spelling?", I would like to suggest that instead of annotations the text is fixed and the annotations is made here in the talk page instead of the main page.

4- I see lots of references about law enforcement in this page, I would like to suggest this is toned down because it can give the impression to law enforcement members reading the Wiki that we are assisting crime, when the mission of boywiki privacy pages are assisting people in privacy to avoid discrimination and hackers and because privacy is a human right.

Just my opinion, when writing something one should assume 100% that law enforcement is reading it too and ask himself, could this be misconstrued to look like we are assisting crime? And if it looks like you are doing that, best change the wording because press and cops love to make up stories that don't exist and frame people if they are suspected pedophiles, they sure as hell would love to have a reason to raid freespirits if they could find one just because of their hatred for pedosexuals.

--Eskimo (talk) 16:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


Like this:

Security Methods

Have two computers; a normal everyday one to use for everything not BL related, and a separate one with no hard drive in it. Just slip in a 'Tails OS CD', boot from that and you are up and running on a secure Tor system that does not leave any history on your computer that can be used in court. You may want to look into that here:

https://tails.boum.org/
I do not understand why the information (which is 100% accurate) that I included:
  • NOTE: If you wish to skip the details of browser security, and use a safe, secure "out-of-the-box" program, see the article on the Tor proxy with its built-in special version of Firefox browser that, when used properly, will keep you safe and not store any browser history on your computer.
... has been removed. User4 (talk) 14:35, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

User4 and Wanker

You guys have been doing a good job at staying civil with each other which i very much appreciate. Please continue to try to work together and make this the best entry it can be even if there are points of contention. I appreciate and am excited about the work both of you guys are putting in to this entry. --Etenne BLSmileyface.png 15:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)