Talk:List of boylove-related publications (date): Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
(new)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Etenne--most of these are now available on the Internet, for reading/downloading. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 08:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
:------------ OLDER COMMENTS BELOW
Hi guys,
Hi guys,



Latest revision as of 08:26, 11 April 2016

Etenne--most of these are now available on the Internet, for reading/downloading. User4 (talk) 08:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

------------ OLDER COMMENTS BELOW

Hi guys,

Just a comment regarding format. I think that dividing the publications by date may be problematic. Bibliographies are usually alphabetical and I think for good reason. I am familiar with many of the authors and many of the publications in this list. Looking at one reference or another tends to make me want to search for another. I've already got a few ideas for filling in missing links. But the format as it is makes that somewhat difficult. Year of publication doesn't strike me as a particularlty useful (or conventional) way of organizing the information. I think a straight alphabetical listing by author name, with dates of publication indicated, would be much more useful and convenient.

Jim

You may wish to review List of boylove-related publications. Automatic consistency checking between the two lists is possible, but I haven't yet written a program to do so. If you would prefer to make updates in the alphabetical section, these can be transferred to the chronological list later. Another option would be to use a browser search function. --Foo 23:27, 18 February 2006 (EST)