Template:Science and technology: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<div style="margin:12px; border:1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0.2em 0.4em; background-color:# | <div style="margin:12px; border:1px solid #dfdfdf; padding: 0.2em 0.4em; background-color:#f8f8ff; align:left;" font-size:120%;"> | ||
* [[Meta-Analysis Prevalence Pedophilia Hebephilia by Filip Schuster]] | * [[Meta-Analysis Prevalence Pedophilia Hebephilia by Filip Schuster]] | ||
:A meta-analysis of all seven relevant phallometric studies reveals that 22% of normal men show greater or equal sexual arousal to child stimuli (individuals up to 13 years old) than to adult stimuli. Combined results of two of these studies reveal male prevalence rates of about 3% for pedophilia (mostly sexually aroused by prepubescents) and about 16% for hebephilia (mostly sexually aroused by pubescents). Details of these studies are described, and implications of the results for sexual science and society are discussed. | :A meta-analysis of all seven relevant phallometric studies reveals that 22% of normal men show greater or equal sexual arousal to child stimuli (individuals up to 13 years old) than to adult stimuli. Combined results of two of these studies reveal male prevalence rates of about 3% for pedophilia (mostly sexually aroused by prepubescents) and about 16% for hebephilia (mostly sexually aroused by pubescents). Details of these studies are described, and implications of the results for sexual science and society are discussed. | ||
Revision as of 17:27, 2 December 2014
 |
Science and technology
- A meta-analysis of all seven relevant phallometric studies reveals that 22% of normal men show greater or equal sexual arousal to child stimuli (individuals up to 13 years old) than to adult stimuli. Combined results of two of these studies reveal male prevalence rates of about 3% for pedophilia (mostly sexually aroused by prepubescents) and about 16% for hebephilia (mostly sexually aroused by pubescents). Details of these studies are described, and implications of the results for sexual science and society are discussed.
