View source for Talk:State v. Schad

"that ruled that the probationer, a convicted sex offender, could not be prohibited from grocery shopping" is not factually correct. The appeal's court remanded and ordered the trial court to determine whether grocery shopping was an essential activity in this case or not. If not, then it would be required by the appellate court to be removed from the probation conditions. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 22:08, 5 March 2015 (UTC)