Child molestor: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
m (Wanker moved page Child molestor to Child molester 2 (to be merged): spelling)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''child molestor''' is generally regarded as an individual who has either been found guilty of sexual contact with a child or who has admitted to such contact,<ref>{{cite journal|journal=Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment|date=April 2000|volume=12|issue=2|pages=95-105|title=Problems with the DSM-IV Diagnosis of Pedophilia|author=William O'Donohue, Lisa G. Regev, Anne Hagstrom}}</ref> although a more literal definition would be someone who bothers a child. Thus, sexual contact that isn't bothersome to the child would not be molestation. (It might be the best thing that ever happened to him.)
A '''child molester''' is generally regarded as an individual who has either been found guilty of sexual contact with a child or who has admitted to such contact,<ref>{{cite journal|journal=Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment|date=April 2000|volume=12|issue=2|pages=95-105|title=Problems with the DSM-IV Diagnosis of Pedophilia|author=William O'Donohue, Lisa G. Regev, Anne Hagstrom}}</ref> although a more literal definition would be someone who bothers a child. Thus, sexual contact that isn't bothersome to the child would not be molestation. (It might be the best thing that ever happened to him.)


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 11:58, 23 May 2015

A child molester is generally regarded as an individual who has either been found guilty of sexual contact with a child or who has admitted to such contact,[1] although a more literal definition would be someone who bothers a child. Thus, sexual contact that isn't bothersome to the child would not be molestation. (It might be the best thing that ever happened to him.)

References

  1. William O'Donohue, Lisa G. Regev, Anne Hagstrom (April 2000). "Problems with the DSM-IV Diagnosis of Pedophilia". Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 12 (2): 95-105.