Child pornography's potential to incite viewers to abuse children: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
(Created page with "'''Child pornography's potential to incite viewers to abuse children''' is sometimes used as an argument for banning production, distribution, and possession of child pornogra...") |
({{mergefrom|Child pornography's normalizing child abuse}}) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{mergefrom|Child pornography's normalizing child abuse}} | |||
'''Child pornography's potential to incite viewers to abuse children''' is sometimes used as an argument for banning production, distribution, and possession of child pornography. In ''[[Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition]]'', the Court characterized this rationale as a forbidden attempt to "constitutionally premise legislation on the desirability of controlling a person's private thoughts." | '''Child pornography's potential to incite viewers to abuse children''' is sometimes used as an argument for banning production, distribution, and possession of child pornography. In ''[[Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition]]'', the Court characterized this rationale as a forbidden attempt to "constitutionally premise legislation on the desirability of controlling a person's private thoughts." | ||
{{navbox child pornography arguments}} | {{navbox child pornography arguments}} | ||
Revision as of 18:16, 29 March 2015
 | It has been suggested that Child pornography's normalizing child abuse be merged into this page. |
Child pornography's potential to incite viewers to abuse children is sometimes used as an argument for banning production, distribution, and possession of child pornography. In Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, the Court characterized this rationale as a forbidden attempt to "constitutionally premise legislation on the desirability of controlling a person's private thoughts."
