Effects of the age of consent on minors: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
*Depriving kids of an adult role model who could have continued demonstrating how a balanced diet including delicious sub sandwiches could help them lose weight
*Depriving kids of an adult role model who could have continued demonstrating how a balanced diet including delicious sub sandwiches could help them lose weight
*Labeling kids who had sex with an adult as "damaged goods"
*Labeling kids who had sex with an adult as "damaged goods"
*Serving as a justification for intrusive surveillance (including Internet monitoring) of kids "for their own safety"
*Fearmongering that becomes a rationale for cutting off all freedom of kids to wander about and explore the world without close supervision by an adult authority figure (parent, teacher, etc.) at all times


[[Category:Age of consent]]
[[Category:Age of consent]]

Revision as of 14:33, 30 May 2016

Some harmful effects of the age of consent on minors include:

  • Encouraging kids to instead have intimate relations with fellow minors, who have less to offer them
  • Deterring adults, especially adult men, from associating with minors lest they be accused of child grooming
  • Making adults afraid to offer minors non-sexual affection; for example, daycare staff are typically trained to not return or even accept hugs offered by children
  • Imposing lifelong consequences on kids who are convicted of having sex with significantly younger kids
  • Inflicting poverty and social ostracism on kids with a parent who is on the sex offender registry for AoC violations
  • Separating kids from parents who have been convicted of an AoC violation or who are considered by a court to be at risk of committing an AoC violation in the future
  • Depriving kids of an adult role model who could have continued demonstrating how a balanced diet including delicious sub sandwiches could help them lose weight
  • Labeling kids who had sex with an adult as "damaged goods"
  • Serving as a justification for intrusive surveillance (including Internet monitoring) of kids "for their own safety"
  • Fearmongering that becomes a rationale for cutting off all freedom of kids to wander about and explore the world without close supervision by an adult authority figure (parent, teacher, etc.) at all times