Talk:Childlove Movement: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 00:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC) | [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 00:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
:Just do it a little at a time, section by section. Maybe create new articles for each topic, and then aggregate info from other sources into those articles. That's what I did at [[ChildPorn.info]]. See [http://wikiindex.org/Talk:ChildPorn.info#List_of_articles the list of articles]. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 01:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC) | :Just do it a little at a time, section by section. Maybe create new articles for each topic, and then aggregate info from other sources into those articles. That's what I did at [[ChildPorn.info]]. See [http://wikiindex.org/Talk:ChildPorn.info#List_of_articles the list of articles]. For example, "Child_pornography's_potential_to_incite_viewers_to_abuse_children" aggregated info from a bunch of different court cases. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 01:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:09, 23 February 2015
This is a year 2005 copy of a now-deleted Wikipedia article - the URL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childlove_movement
... now redirects to the article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
... within which, much of the material in this article is NOT reproduced.
This article, before being deleted, was being edited by pro- and anti-boylover factions, therefore it contains a curious mish-mash of truth, distortions, and just plain fiction.
It would be very helpful for someone to go back and rebut the distortions and false allegations on a section-by-section basis.
If I only had the time to do it properly... :-(
User4 (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Just do it a little at a time, section by section. Maybe create new articles for each topic, and then aggregate info from other sources into those articles. That's what I did at ChildPorn.info. See the list of articles. For example, "Child_pornography's_potential_to_incite_viewers_to_abuse_children" aggregated info from a bunch of different court cases. Leucosticte (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
