Talk:Evil: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:*Please ask yourself before hitting the save button | :*Please ask yourself before hitting the save button | ||
:::Does this have a cultural or historical relevance to boylove? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 02:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC) | :::Does this have a cultural or historical relevance to boylove? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 02:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::Yes, it does have relevance. Boylovers are often accused of being evil, and sometimes they accuse their political adversaries of being evil. To analyze the truthfulness of these claims, we need to examine what exactly is | ::::Yes, it does have relevance. Boylovers are often accused of being evil, and sometimes they accuse their political adversaries of being evil. To analyze the truthfulness of these claims, we need to examine what exactly evil is. The article needs expansion, not deletion. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 02:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:29, 14 May 2015
This belongs in a general article on religion or law. I see little or no reason for an article containing so little information relevant to BoyLovers to be a "standalone" article at BoyWiki.
- Please ask yourself before hitting the save button
- Does this have a cultural or historical relevance to boylove? User4 (talk) 02:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, it does have relevance. Boylovers are often accused of being evil, and sometimes they accuse their political adversaries of being evil. To analyze the truthfulness of these claims, we need to examine what exactly evil is. The article needs expansion, not deletion. Lysander (talk) 02:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Does this have a cultural or historical relevance to boylove? User4 (talk) 02:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
