Talk:Javascript exploit defeats Tor if javascript is enabled in the browser: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
Thomasmann (talk | contribs) (merge?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wouldn't it be better if this page was merged with [[Tor]] so there would just be one article. I think it'd be neater that way. This page being on its own is unnecessary. [[User:Thomasmann|Thomasmann]] ([[User talk:Thomasmann|talk]]) 20:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC) | Wouldn't it be better if this page was merged with [[Tor]] so there would just be one article. I think it'd be neater that way. This page being on its own is unnecessary. [[User:Thomasmann|Thomasmann]] ([[User talk:Thomasmann|talk]]) 20:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
: | |||
: I agree, of course. The reason this is a standalone article is because another editor was editing the Tor article, and he was including non-factual statements about (completely unfounded) "security risks" in Tor. So I wrote this article, and put a "See also" in the Tor article (and maybe in one or two other related articles as well.) Feel free to merge them! [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 21:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:34, 2 May 2016
Wouldn't it be better if this page was merged with Tor so there would just be one article. I think it'd be neater that way. This page being on its own is unnecessary. Thomasmann (talk) 20:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- I agree, of course. The reason this is a standalone article is because another editor was editing the Tor article, and he was including non-factual statements about (completely unfounded) "security risks" in Tor. So I wrote this article, and put a "See also" in the Tor article (and maybe in one or two other related articles as well.) Feel free to merge them! User4 (talk) 21:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
