United States v. Wiegand: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
(Template:Infobox court case doesn't work; it needs Scribunto) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''United States v. Wiegand''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''United States v. Wiegand''}} | ||
'''''[[United States v. Wiegand]]''''' was a case in which, on 18 March 1987, the [[U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]] ruled that "'Lascivious' is no different in its meaning than 'lewd,' a commonsensical term whose constitutionality was specifically upheld in ''[[Miller v. California]]".<ref>{{cite court|url=http://openjurist.org/812/f2d/1239/united-states-v-e-wiegand|vol=812|reporter=F.2d|opinion=1239|court=9th Cir.|litigants=United States v. Wiegand|date=18 March 1987}}</ref> | '''''[[United States v. Wiegand]]''''' was a case in which, on 18 March 1987, the [[U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]] ruled that "'Lascivious' is no different in its meaning than 'lewd,' a commonsensical term whose constitutionality was specifically upheld in ''[[Miller v. California]]''".<ref>{{cite court|url=http://openjurist.org/812/f2d/1239/united-states-v-e-wiegand|vol=812|reporter=F.2d|opinion=1239|court=9th Cir.|litigants=United States v. Wiegand|date=18 March 1987}}</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 20 March 2015
United States v. Wiegand was a case in which, on 18 March 1987, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that "'Lascivious' is no different in its meaning than 'lewd,' a commonsensical term whose constitutionality was specifically upheld in Miller v. California".[1]
References
- ↑ United States v. Wiegand, 812 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 18 March 1987).
