Talk:Building a personal MAA website: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
:::::I would like to do articles on other posters, especially activist posters. For example, [[martirwithacause]] has contributed more in terms of activism in the past 5 years or so than perhaps any other person on the Internet! But there are those who do not wish that "the truth be told" about some posters. They prefer that "the lies be told"! Can you believe it? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 21:05, 20 June 2015 (UTC) | :::::I would like to do articles on other posters, especially activist posters. For example, [[martirwithacause]] has contributed more in terms of activism in the past 5 years or so than perhaps any other person on the Internet! But there are those who do not wish that "the truth be told" about some posters. They prefer that "the lies be told"! Can you believe it? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 21:05, 20 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::: Yes, that is very good info to have. For me, the history of this entry is more interesting than the article itself. Please take this as me being supportive but along with improving your citations, you could work on adding/improving your introductions. Now you may feel that I am being critical but that is only because I expect great things from you --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 21:56, 20 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::::: I have links to a great deal of information about Kevin Brown, as well as on other posters, including martirwithacause. | |||
::::::: Kevin Brown's history is particularly tragic! The "system" steamrolled him, and almost completely destroyed his life. He eventually did receive some recompense, but not nearly sufficient to make up for all that he lost. | |||
::::::: It would take a lot of work to do the research for activist articles, and to write the articles. And some of the information (though factual, and with links to demonstrate the truthfulness of any claims being made) may tend to be quite controversial. | |||
::::::: There are powerful forces at work to suppress information -- the truth -- about certain "activist" posters from becoming public knowledge, perhaps due to a wish to suppress those poster's activist work, and to protect certain other people from "embarrassment" (not from ''real harms''). Some people do not like their faults, their mistakes, or their prejudices, to be publicly aired. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 22:30, 20 June 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 22:30, 20 June 2015
Proposed for deletion
This entry it just too big of a mess and will never be fixable enough to be a useable article.
- 4. No indication of importance (Individuals, organizations, events)--Etenne (talk) 13:17, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- 7 Abandoned entry, article, or draft left incomplete having structural issues that make it unreadable.
- RE: 7 Abandoned entry, article, or draft left incomplete having structural issues that make it unreadable.
- Then only articles that you have an interest in should appear on BoyWiki?
- What a very strange attitude to have as the one in charge of BoyWiki!
- Also: This entry it just too big of a mess and will never be fixable enough to be a useable article.
- Just following your advice on tightening up on what is acceptable[1] I am been accused of being too lax in what I allow and as much as I would like to, I simply can't go and recode and fix every entry. People are going to have to start putting in the work and not simply dumping stuff on BoyWiki. --Etenne (talk) 14:08, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- ↑ "This article is far from being very professional, and does not belong on BoyWiki." User4 (talk) 13:14, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Then you'd better consider how to get more people to join BoyWiki as editors who can do the work that is necessary, including re-coding markup when necessary. This requires skills at managing the editors -- that is, encouraging them, rather than discouraging them. But I have mentioned that before, haven't I? How many times have you said,
- "Good work! Nice article! But do you think that instead of putting the references directly under the quoted sections, could you look at how it can be done with reflists? Then the article will be much better quality! Anyway, thanks for your contribution! We can all work together to make BoyWiki a better experience!"
- Then you'd better consider how to get more people to join BoyWiki as editors who can do the work that is necessary, including re-coding markup when necessary. This requires skills at managing the editors -- that is, encouraging them, rather than discouraging them. But I have mentioned that before, haven't I? How many times have you said,
- I don't remember seeing you say anything in such a way -- which is a way that encourages those contributing their time and energy for free to BoyWiki, rather than discouraging further contributions. Do you see what I mean? User4 (talk) 14:19, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- That is a just statement. I should praise you more for the good work you do and that is my fault. I do like much of the stuff you post or see the potential for some of it it to be better in the future. I have always been your supporter (even when you call me everything but a white man). I have always felt that you have a great deal to offer BoyWiki and our community. However, I also know you can do much better work then this article represents. As it is now, is it work that your are proud of and feel is representative of your best? --Etenne (talk) 14:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- I don't remember seeing you say anything in such a way -- which is a way that encourages those contributing their time and energy for free to BoyWiki, rather than discouraging further contributions. Do you see what I mean? User4 (talk) 14:19, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Well, gee... since you put it so nicely ;-) -- I suppose that I could take 15 or 20 minutes of my time and make it much more acceptable. Not perfect, perhaps, but nearer to the quality standards of BoyWiki. User4 (talk) 14:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- ----------------
- Yes, actually, it's almost perfect now! I'm really amazed. I apologize for saying that "This entry it just too big of a mess and will never be fixable enough to be a useable article." My mistake. And I should not have so quickly tagged the article for deletion, either. Making threats like that is wrong. Another "My mistake." Nobody is perfect ;) ... Live and learn...
- I did not know that you could fix it up in just a little over 20 minutes! Could you teach me some of your "tricks"? I would like to save time editing articles, too.
- I do have one question, though. I still don't know what an "MAA website" is? Minor attracted adult?
- Anyway, thanks for the article. I'm sure it will be useful for those wishing to be "activists"!
- Yes, "MAA" refers to a Minor Attracted Adult. The material was created by Kevin Brown, an activist with a long history at BoyChat. Unfortunately, I hesitate to do an article on him -- some people do not like the history of posters being given -- even though the history is all on line, and available for everyone to see!
- I would like to do articles on other posters, especially activist posters. For example, martirwithacause has contributed more in terms of activism in the past 5 years or so than perhaps any other person on the Internet! But there are those who do not wish that "the truth be told" about some posters. They prefer that "the lies be told"! Can you believe it? User4 (talk) 21:05, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that is very good info to have. For me, the history of this entry is more interesting than the article itself. Please take this as me being supportive but along with improving your citations, you could work on adding/improving your introductions. Now you may feel that I am being critical but that is only because I expect great things from you --Etenne (talk) 21:56, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- I have links to a great deal of information about Kevin Brown, as well as on other posters, including martirwithacause.
- Kevin Brown's history is particularly tragic! The "system" steamrolled him, and almost completely destroyed his life. He eventually did receive some recompense, but not nearly sufficient to make up for all that he lost.
- It would take a lot of work to do the research for activist articles, and to write the articles. And some of the information (though factual, and with links to demonstrate the truthfulness of any claims being made) may tend to be quite controversial.
- There are powerful forces at work to suppress information -- the truth -- about certain "activist" posters from becoming public knowledge, perhaps due to a wish to suppress those poster's activist work, and to protect certain other people from "embarrassment" (not from real harms). Some people do not like their faults, their mistakes, or their prejudices, to be publicly aired. User4 (talk) 22:30, 20 June 2015 (UTC)