Talk:Martin Goldberg: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
One thing that concerns me is the claims that he secretly took locker room photos of kids is that it can not be verified and may well be propaganda from a botched Azov investigation released to the press by the police to "cover their ass". Keep in mind that this guy was not a gym teacher. Does it make sense? --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 12:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
One thing that concerns me is the claims that he secretly took locker room photos of kids is that it can not be verified and may well be propaganda from a botched Azov investigation released to the press by the police to "cover their ass". Keep in mind that this guy was not a gym teacher. Does it make sense? This guy wasn't a criminal, he was a highly educated successful professional and not some down on his luck perv. looking at little boy's peepees in the public rest room. Remember that this guy likely did not know he had done anything illegal as Azov films were marketed as a legal product alongside award winning foreign films. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 12:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:50, 12 August 2015

One thing that concerns me is the claims that he secretly took locker room photos of kids is that it can not be verified and may well be propaganda from a botched Azov investigation released to the press by the police to "cover their ass". Keep in mind that this guy was not a gym teacher. Does it make sense? This guy wasn't a criminal, he was a highly educated successful professional and not some down on his luck perv. looking at little boy's peepees in the public rest room. Remember that this guy likely did not know he had done anything illegal as Azov films were marketed as a legal product alongside award winning foreign films. --Etenne (talk) 12:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)