Talk:Richard Yuill: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 01:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 01:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
:Neither really, BoyWiki just has different categories then Newgon.wiki. It can go in multiple categories such as encyclopedia, research, people etc... whatever is appropriate. It just needs to correspond to this wiki.  --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 01:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)  
:Neither really, BoyWiki just has different categories then Newgon.wiki. It can go in multiple categories such as encyclopedia, research, people etc... whatever is appropriate. It just needs to correspond to this wiki.  --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 01:20, 19 February 2015  
 
Also Newgon.wiki had a slightly different focus then BoyWiki.... even though there is a lot of crossover. It was primarily a child love wiki. BoyWik's mission is to record and preserve our own history, culture, and heritage as boylovers.
 
 
(UTC)  
(test - ignore the following)
(test - ignore the following)



Revision as of 01:41, 19 February 2015

Etenne, I was wondering why, at Newgon.wiki, this article was include in the following categories:

[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category: Queer Theory]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Gay]][[Category:Sociological Theory]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Youth]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research on "Child Molesters"]][[Category:Research into effects on Children]][[Category:Research: Broader Perspectives]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: British]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:History & Events: Personal Scandals]][[Category:History & Events]][[Category:History & Events: British]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]

... while here at BW, this is the only category?

[[Category:People|Yuill Richard]]

Do you think they made some kind of a big mistake with their use of categories, or do you think that Newgon may have had some very good reasons for placing the article in the categories that they did? Can you think of any reasons that they may have had for doing so? What do you think? User4 (talk) 01:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Neither really, BoyWiki just has different categories then Newgon.wiki. It can go in multiple categories such as encyclopedia, research, people etc... whatever is appropriate. It just needs to correspond to this wiki. --Etenne (talk) 01:20, 19 February 2015

Also Newgon.wiki had a slightly different focus then BoyWiki.... even though there is a lot of crossover. It was primarily a child love wiki. BoyWik's mission is to record and preserve our own history, culture, and heritage as boylovers.


(UTC) (test - ignore the following)

test: tildes

one ~

two ~~

three User4 (talk)

four User4 (talk) 01:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

five 01:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

six 01:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)~

end test