BoyWiki:Agora/18 April 2015: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
(Every other wiki in the entire world categorizes in a different way than BoyWiki does. Isn't that a little strange?)
Line 3: Line 3:
Do you want to include essays in mainspace, or should we create a separate namespace for them? If they are going to be put in mainspace, should they be formatted differently than other articles, so that it's immediately evident that they're essays, or does the byline adequately signal that? [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 19:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Do you want to include essays in mainspace, or should we create a separate namespace for them? If they are going to be put in mainspace, should they be formatted differently than other articles, so that it's immediately evident that they're essays, or does the byline adequately signal that? [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 19:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
:Essays should go in [[:Category:Life]]. Plus to be frank, I find it really annoying when people refuse to take the time to categorize their entries properly (or expect me to do it) or following our category layout. I mean there are only three main categories, and they give explanations on what is suppose to go into each section. Category Encyclopedia is a mess and I am not going to clean it up. I will keep categories Entertainment and Life organized but it is up to you guys who are working primary in category encyclopedia to fix it. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 13:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
:Essays should go in [[:Category:Life]]. Plus to be frank, I find it really annoying when people refuse to take the time to categorize their entries properly (or expect me to do it) or following our category layout. I mean there are only three main categories, and they give explanations on what is suppose to go into each section. Category Encyclopedia is a mess and I am not going to clean it up. I will keep categories Entertainment and Life organized but it is up to you guys who are working primary in category encyclopedia to fix it. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 13:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
::: WTF? '''''BoyWiki has no "category layout"!'''''
:::Essays should go where people can find them easily if they are interested in reading them. In fact, ''everything'' should be easy to find for anyone interested. Burying an article within one single category because it is the "correct" category, and a category that people would not normally expect that article to be found in, is an excellent way to make the articles just disappear from the reader's view.
:::With your way of "categorizing" (in quotes because you do not seem to understand the real reasoning and method behind categorization) you have succeeded in burying most articles on BoyWiki so they cannot be easily, if at all, found by visitors.
:::Why would you want to do that? Why would you ''not'' want people to be able to ''easily'' find things that interest them? Why do you seem to think that there is only "one correct category" for each article?
:::BoyWiki is '''''the only wiki in the world''''' that categorizes articles in the way that you do. Doesn't that make you think that BoyWiki perhaps is doing something ''wrong''? Or do you think that ''every other wiki in the world'' is wrong in the way they categorize things?
:::BoyWiki should allow those who understand how and why things are professionally categorized in the ways that they are to set up a "categorization layout". Of the editors who are now active, which one appears to have the ''most'' skills necessary to do that the best? You? Wanker? Lysander? Who?
:::* [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 09:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
::Yeah, or we need more wikignomes, or to organize the work better. If someone knows they're adding a page to a broader category than it should be in, they could add a template noting that later recategorization is needed. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 16:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
::Yeah, or we need more wikignomes, or to organize the work better. If someone knows they're adding a page to a broader category than it should be in, they could add a template noting that later recategorization is needed. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 16:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:13, 20 April 2015

Agora/18 April 2015

Essays in mainspace

Do you want to include essays in mainspace, or should we create a separate namespace for them? If they are going to be put in mainspace, should they be formatted differently than other articles, so that it's immediately evident that they're essays, or does the byline adequately signal that? Lysander (talk) 19:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Essays should go in Category:Life. Plus to be frank, I find it really annoying when people refuse to take the time to categorize their entries properly (or expect me to do it) or following our category layout. I mean there are only three main categories, and they give explanations on what is suppose to go into each section. Category Encyclopedia is a mess and I am not going to clean it up. I will keep categories Entertainment and Life organized but it is up to you guys who are working primary in category encyclopedia to fix it. --Etenne (talk) 13:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
WTF? BoyWiki has no "category layout"!
Essays should go where people can find them easily if they are interested in reading them. In fact, everything should be easy to find for anyone interested. Burying an article within one single category because it is the "correct" category, and a category that people would not normally expect that article to be found in, is an excellent way to make the articles just disappear from the reader's view.
With your way of "categorizing" (in quotes because you do not seem to understand the real reasoning and method behind categorization) you have succeeded in burying most articles on BoyWiki so they cannot be easily, if at all, found by visitors.
Why would you want to do that? Why would you not want people to be able to easily find things that interest them? Why do you seem to think that there is only "one correct category" for each article?
BoyWiki is the only wiki in the world that categorizes articles in the way that you do. Doesn't that make you think that BoyWiki perhaps is doing something wrong? Or do you think that every other wiki in the world is wrong in the way they categorize things?
BoyWiki should allow those who understand how and why things are professionally categorized in the ways that they are to set up a "categorization layout". Of the editors who are now active, which one appears to have the most skills necessary to do that the best? You? Wanker? Lysander? Who?


Yeah, or we need more wikignomes, or to organize the work better. If someone knows they're adding a page to a broader category than it should be in, they could add a template noting that later recategorization is needed. Lysander (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)