Category talk:Boylove: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
(:::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. ~~~~) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | ::I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many ''factual errors'' that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 02:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | :::Who said that girllovers have any less status than boylovers on BoyWiki? At any rate, no one here can prove that they are a boylover. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 02:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::You know, you're right. We should allow anyone in the world to edit BoyWiki, right? ''Anyone!'' I'll put out the word to members of the KKK, to Judith Reisman, and to many others, that they can now become editors at BoyWiki! Just think of the fine articles we will have! | |||
::::: | |||
::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Internet_dog.jpg And about proving oneself...] | |||
:Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | :Wouldn't love be a parent category and then girllove and childlove would be articles under that category? [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 21:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:00, 10 May 2015
I would argue that as a wiki about boylove that boylove is the main category and love the sub-catogory.--Etenne (talk) 21:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- I would argue that girllovers, as guests at BoyWiki, should respect the genuine boylovers at BoyWiki, and avoid being combative, disruptive, pessimistic, overly critical, denigratory, obtuse, hard-headed, and that they should correctly maintain their own articles by correcting the many factual errors that those articles they create contain. And yes, I agree with your argument above, too. User4 (talk) 01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- You know, you're right. We should allow anyone in the world to edit BoyWiki, right? Anyone! I'll put out the word to members of the KKK, to Judith Reisman, and to many others, that they can now become editors at BoyWiki! Just think of the fine articles we will have!
- And about proving oneself...
- You know, you're right. We should allow anyone in the world to edit BoyWiki, right? Anyone! I'll put out the word to members of the KKK, to Judith Reisman, and to many others, that they can now become editors at BoyWiki! Just think of the fine articles we will have!
