Category talk:Encyclopedia: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
m (Protected "Category talk:Encyclopedia" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
*3-12-15 - We need to start placing the articles from Category Encyclopedia into subcategories. The only pages that should remain in the category itself are those that do not fit into a subcategory of their own (as of yet). If you are working on one particular area of study, please add top general category for that subject and later we can go back and add the pages to other subcategories as appropriate or as naturally indicated. Example.  '''General''' ...Art -> European art -> French art -> Parisian artists. '''Specific''' --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 12:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
*3-12-15 - We need to start placing the articles from Category Encyclopedia into subcategories. The only pages that should remain in the category itself are those that do not fit into a subcategory of their own (as of yet). If you are working on one particular area of study/interest, please add top general category for that subject and later we can go back and add the pages to other subcategories as appropriate or as naturally indicated. Example.  '''General''' ...Art -> European art -> French art -> Parisian artists. '''Specific'''  
*Some of the current subcategories may be moved to a new more general top level subcategory where indicated.
--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 12:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
:Category:Encyclopedia is a top level category and should only contain sub-categories. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 13:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
::*You should always start out with the most general category and progress to more specific as naturally indicated. In other words, starting out with "Category:English poets from London in 1910" is too specific unless you have several others (a grouping) that fit into that category. In this case, they should go into Category:Poets  which would be a subcategory of Category:authors and well as perhaps Category:Poetry which would be a subcategory of Category:Literature etc... --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 14:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
:::This page can be used as a guide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Main_topic_classifications --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 18:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:21, 24 June 2022

  • 3-12-15 - We need to start placing the articles from Category Encyclopedia into subcategories. The only pages that should remain in the category itself are those that do not fit into a subcategory of their own (as of yet). If you are working on one particular area of study/interest, please add top general category for that subject and later we can go back and add the pages to other subcategories as appropriate or as naturally indicated. Example. General ...Art -> European art -> French art -> Parisian artists. Specific
  • Some of the current subcategories may be moved to a new more general top level subcategory where indicated.

--Etenne (talk) 12:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Encyclopedia is a top level category and should only contain sub-categories. --Etenne (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
  • You should always start out with the most general category and progress to more specific as naturally indicated. In other words, starting out with "Category:English poets from London in 1910" is too specific unless you have several others (a grouping) that fit into that category. In this case, they should go into Category:Poets which would be a subcategory of Category:authors and well as perhaps Category:Poetry which would be a subcategory of Category:Literature etc... --Etenne (talk) 14:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
This page can be used as a guide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Main_topic_classifications --Etenne (talk) 18:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)