Category talk:Essential reading for BoyLovers: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I wonder if in the future this category could be broken down into like: [[:Category:Essential reading for BoyLovers/basic]] - [[:Category:Essential reading for BoyLovers/intermediate]] - [[:Category:Essential reading for BoyLovers/advanced]]. Some things just seem more "Essential" then others. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px]] 12:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC) | I wonder if in the future this category could be broken down into like: [[:Category:Essential reading for BoyLovers/basic]] - [[:Category:Essential reading for BoyLovers/intermediate]] - [[:Category:Essential reading for BoyLovers/advanced]]. Some things just seem more "Essential" then others. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px]] 12:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Hmm... I see what you're saying. How do ''other'' wikis categorize ''their'' materials, keeping in mind the importance of making materials easy-to-find, keeping similar materials together, and allowing "sub-categories" to be created--to focus attention when necessary--by using the "magic" of html linking? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:02, 22 March 2016
I wonder if in the future this category could be broken down into like: Category:Essential reading for BoyLovers/basic - Category:Essential reading for BoyLovers/intermediate - Category:Essential reading for BoyLovers/advanced. Some things just seem more "Essential" then others. --Etenne 
12:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm... I see what you're saying. How do other wikis categorize their materials, keeping in mind the importance of making materials easy-to-find, keeping similar materials together, and allowing "sub-categories" to be created--to focus attention when necessary--by using the "magic" of html linking? User4 (talk) 14:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
