|
|
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Most of these (IMNSHO) also belong in the category "Encyclopedia". To manually add the category to each of them would be ''very time-consuming''. There ''is'' a way to automatically add the category to each of these, by using a "bot".
| |
|
| |
|
| I suggest that it is essential that BW admin investigate as soon as possible the design and use of "bots" so as to save the time and effort of editors - time which could be ''much better spent'' on improving the articles rather than on "mechanical" and "repetitive" tasks, which are ''exactly'' what computer programs were designed for - to automate tasks and make life simpler and better for humans.
| |
|
| |
| Until very recently, there ''was'' a user here at BW who displayed skills with "bots", but for some reason he has now (apparently) ceased to make any further contributions here at BW. Was he somehow discouraged by the actions or attitudes of some here? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 14:36, 9 April 2014 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| :All articles in Category:Fledgling were put there because they are incomplete. If you wish to finish any of them and add them to the appropriate categories, I would encourage you to do so.
| |
|
| |
| :As for Bots, I will ask the BoyWiki counsel what they think.
| |
|
| |
| :As for the user you ask about, I don't know who you are talking about?
| |
|
| |
| --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 14:44, 9 April 2014 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
| ::If all articles which are "incomplete" are excluded from the categories which they correctly belong to, then ''no'' articles should be classified in ''any'' categories.
| |
|
| |
| ::Wiki articles are ''always'' subject to editing and improvement. That, by definition, is ''exactly what a wiki is!'' Wiki articles are ''never'' "complete". [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 15:32, 9 April 2014 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
| ::: Nothing has been purposefully excluded... I looked at the first few articles are all of them were categorized in their proper category. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 15:55, 9 April 2014 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
| ::::I see now that you, indeed, don't "get it".
| |
|
| |
| ::::I may have to reconsider my continuing participation here. [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 16:13, 9 April 2014 (CEST)
| |
