Child pornography's potential to incite viewers to abuse children: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
(Created page with "'''Child pornography's potential to incite viewers to abuse children''' is sometimes used as an argument for banning production, distribution, and possession of child pornogra...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Draft}} | |||
'''Child pornography's potential to incite viewers to abuse children''' is sometimes used as an argument for banning production, distribution, and possession of child pornography. In ''[[Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition]]'', the Court characterized this rationale as a forbidden attempt to "constitutionally premise legislation on the desirability of controlling a person's private thoughts." | '''Child pornography's potential to incite viewers to abuse children''' is sometimes used as an argument for banning production, distribution, and possession of child pornography. In ''[[Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition]]'', the Court characterized this rationale as a forbidden attempt to "constitutionally premise legislation on the desirability of controlling a person's private thoughts." | ||
{{navbox child pornography arguments}} | {{navbox child pornography arguments}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:37, 13 April 2015
 | Note this page is still under construction. |
Child pornography's potential to incite viewers to abuse children is sometimes used as an argument for banning production, distribution, and possession of child pornography. In Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, the Court characterized this rationale as a forbidden attempt to "constitutionally premise legislation on the desirability of controlling a person's private thoughts."
