|
|
| (18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == The image provided ==
| |
|
| |
|
| In ''some'' jurisdictions around the world, the viewing of that image ''may'' be illegal (it may be considered to be "child pornography" or "an image depicting child sexual abuse". By a visitor clicking on the link to our article, the visitor may be exposing himself to prosecution in his local jurisdiction, and BoyWiki would be complicit in his prosecution. Is this a good idea? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 15:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
| |
| :Wikipedia seems to be getting away with it. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 16:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ::Actually, I thought the same thing as user4 at first but after a very long conversations, the Wiki Council decided that because that is without question considered art that it would be OK to use it for now. That image has been shown on TV in both the UK and USA and I believe you maybe correct that this copy of that image originated at Wikipedia. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 16:11, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
| |
| :::Whether it counts as art would be relevant if the standard being applied were the ''Miller'' test (''Miller v. California'', 413 U.S. 15 (1973)). A different standard applies to child pornography, per ''New York v. Ferber'' (458 U.S. 747 (1982)). In that case, the court ruled that "a work which, taken on the whole, contains serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value may nevertheless embody the hardest core of child pornography. 'It is irrelevant to the child [who has been abused] whether or not the material . . . has a literary, artistic, political or social value.'" ''Ferber'', though, was a case that dealt with images whose production involved an actual child. I'm not sure if that difference is relevant or not. Theoretical issues aside, I doubt anyone would get prosecuted for an image of the Warren cup. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 16:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
| |
