Power differential: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "The '''power differential''' or '''power imbalance''' between adults and minors is one justification often given for prohibitions on sex between them. The difference in physic...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''power differential''' or '''power imbalance''' between adults and minors is one justification often given for prohibitions on sex between them. The difference in physical stature and strength alone does not mean there is a lack of [[consent]]; otherwise, a petite 18-year-old woman could not consent to sex with a muscular bodybuilder boyfriend. Rather, the issue is mental capacity to give [[informed consent]] and the possible existence of a real or perceived custodian-ward relationship. It is sometimes said that children think they have to, or should, do whatever adults tell them, and that they lack the judgment to know any different. Bad judgment is only deemed to prevent consent when the person is either a minor or extremely mentally impaired, though; otherwise, unprotected sex with promiscuous individuals picked up in bars might be deemed non-consensual. | The '''power differential''' or '''power imbalance''' between adults and minors is one justification often given for prohibitions on sex between them. The difference in physical stature and strength alone does not mean there is a lack of [[consent]]; otherwise, a petite 18-year-old woman could not consent to sex with a muscular bodybuilder boyfriend. Rather, the issue is mental capacity to give [[informed consent]] and the possible existence of a real or perceived custodian-ward relationship. It is sometimes said that children think they have to, or should, do whatever adults tell them, and that they lack the judgment to know any different. Bad judgment is only deemed to prevent consent when the person is either a minor or extremely mentally impaired, though; otherwise, unprotected sex with promiscuous individuals picked up in bars might be deemed non-consensual. | ||
One argument often made is that if a parent were allowed to have sex with his child, the power differential would make it possible to [[coercion|coerce]] the child into sex. Given the current system, in which such sex is banned, the child can (if he is aware of this option) complain to the authorities if he is being [[child molestation|molested]] or otherwise aggressed against, and get the parent thrown in prison, and himself placed in the care of someone besides that parent (e.g. [[foster care]]). Thus, under the current system, it would be incorrect to accuse a parent who has sex with his child of coercing him (unless one views it as a form of coercion to stop providing the child with resources). [[Libertarian]]s would favor giving children even more options, such as that of entering the workforce, so that he would have more ways to escape [[child abuse|abusive]] situations. | |||
[[Category:Encyclopedia]] | [[Category:Encyclopedia]] | ||
Revision as of 16:19, 10 June 2014
The power differential or power imbalance between adults and minors is one justification often given for prohibitions on sex between them. The difference in physical stature and strength alone does not mean there is a lack of consent; otherwise, a petite 18-year-old woman could not consent to sex with a muscular bodybuilder boyfriend. Rather, the issue is mental capacity to give informed consent and the possible existence of a real or perceived custodian-ward relationship. It is sometimes said that children think they have to, or should, do whatever adults tell them, and that they lack the judgment to know any different. Bad judgment is only deemed to prevent consent when the person is either a minor or extremely mentally impaired, though; otherwise, unprotected sex with promiscuous individuals picked up in bars might be deemed non-consensual.
One argument often made is that if a parent were allowed to have sex with his child, the power differential would make it possible to coerce the child into sex. Given the current system, in which such sex is banned, the child can (if he is aware of this option) complain to the authorities if he is being molested or otherwise aggressed against, and get the parent thrown in prison, and himself placed in the care of someone besides that parent (e.g. foster care). Thus, under the current system, it would be incorrect to accuse a parent who has sex with his child of coercing him (unless one views it as a form of coercion to stop providing the child with resources). Libertarians would favor giving children even more options, such as that of entering the workforce, so that he would have more ways to escape abusive situations.
