Talk:Azov Prosecutions and Amazon.com: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ambox | |||
| image = [[Image:Information icon.png|50px]] | |||
|info =Azov Prosecutions and Amazon.com was deleted for the following reason: It was not footnoted, ie, it made criminal allegations toward Amazon.com without documentation and was potentially libelous. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 13:59, 1 May 2014 (CEST)}} | |||
If Amazon.com became the target of such prosecutions, they have the resources to fight effectively. | If Amazon.com became the target of such prosecutions, they have the resources to fight effectively. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 11: | ||
This article is opinion and needs to be referenced. | This article is opinion and needs to be referenced. | ||
--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] 23:45, 26 March 2014 (GMT) | --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] 23:45, 26 March 2014 (GMT) | ||
--- | |||
I was instructed by you to <em>stay out</em> of the Azov pages. P~ | |||
It would be fairly simple to reference, wouldn't it? I'll bet that Will could do it in his sleep. | |||
[[User:User4|User4]] 23:55, 26 March 2014 (GMT) | |||
---- | |||
I think this is a great topic and something you should pursue but it needs better documentation. | |||
See: [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]] | |||
--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] 23:59, 26 March 2014 (GMT) | |||
--- | |||
Why not have Will take a look at it? He is intimately familiar with the Azov cases, and all of their details. I think my time would be better spent on something other than becoming an expert on Azov cases when an expert already is "on our team". | |||
Don' you agree? | |||
[[User:User4|User4]] 00:16, 27 March 2014 (GMT) | |||
--- | |||
You really can't tell other writers on which topic they should write.... I figured that since you added this entry that it was a topic you were interested in writing about. | |||
--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] 00:25, 27 March 2014 (GMT) | |||
--- | |||
"Why not have Will take a look at it?" is not telling other writers what to write about. It is just recommending that Will take a look at it. He may or may not be interested, but shouldn't he have the opportunity to make that decision for himself? | |||
[[User:User4|User4]] 00:29, 27 March 2014 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:39, 1 May 2014
 |
If Amazon.com became the target of such prosecutions, they have the resources to fight effectively.
User4 23:41, 26 March 2014 (GMT)
This article is opinion and needs to be referenced. --Etenne 23:45, 26 March 2014 (GMT)
---
I was instructed by you to stay out of the Azov pages. P~
It would be fairly simple to reference, wouldn't it? I'll bet that Will could do it in his sleep.
User4 23:55, 26 March 2014 (GMT)
I think this is a great topic and something you should pursue but it needs better documentation. See: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
--Etenne 23:59, 26 March 2014 (GMT)
---
Why not have Will take a look at it? He is intimately familiar with the Azov cases, and all of their details. I think my time would be better spent on something other than becoming an expert on Azov cases when an expert already is "on our team".
Don' you agree?
User4 00:16, 27 March 2014 (GMT)
---
You really can't tell other writers on which topic they should write.... I figured that since you added this entry that it was a topic you were interested in writing about.
--Etenne 00:25, 27 March 2014 (GMT)
---
"Why not have Will take a look at it?" is not telling other writers what to write about. It is just recommending that Will take a look at it. He may or may not be interested, but shouldn't he have the opportunity to make that decision for himself?
User4 00:29, 27 March 2014 (GMT)
