Talk:Coitus (dictionary): Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
(Created page with "I am wondering why it is useful to have this on a Wiki about boylove? --~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am wondering why it is useful to have this on a Wiki about boylove? --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px]] 11:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | I am wondering why it is useful to have this on a Wiki about boylove? --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px]] 11:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Hmm... I can see why. Actually, the definition is incorrect. "Coitus" is a synonym for "sexual intercourse". And, you see from the dictionary entry, "sexual intercourse" is not a very precise term. When I made the "coitus" entry, I was thinking about other things, and I never came back and did the entry correctly. But now that you have brought the subject up, I guess I have little excuse not to fix it... But it may take a little while--you see, I'm in the middle of editing and proof-reading ''several dozen'' books, as well as a large handful of articles... But I keep finding new materials relevant to BoyLove that '''''no one in the past 30 or 40 years''''' has thought were important enough (or else were worth the bother) to make accessible for others to read. The literature today is ''all'' slanted towards the "antis" (distorted) point of view. We need ''our'' materials published, too!!! <small>[END OF RANT] <small>Oh, Lord -- if ''only'' I had a ''little help'' with it!...<small>[END OF END OF RANT] </small></small></small> [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 12:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:39, 21 March 2016
I am wondering why it is useful to have this on a Wiki about boylove? --Etenne 
11:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm... I can see why. Actually, the definition is incorrect. "Coitus" is a synonym for "sexual intercourse". And, you see from the dictionary entry, "sexual intercourse" is not a very precise term. When I made the "coitus" entry, I was thinking about other things, and I never came back and did the entry correctly. But now that you have brought the subject up, I guess I have little excuse not to fix it... But it may take a little while--you see, I'm in the middle of editing and proof-reading several dozen books, as well as a large handful of articles... But I keep finding new materials relevant to BoyLove that no one in the past 30 or 40 years has thought were important enough (or else were worth the bother) to make accessible for others to read. The literature today is all slanted towards the "antis" (distorted) point of view. We need our materials published, too!!! [END OF RANT] Oh, Lord -- if only I had a little help with it!...[END OF END OF RANT] User4 (talk) 12:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
