Talk:Underwear: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
No edit summary |
(:I recommend reverting the removal. A solution to potential censorship issues is to create backups and prepare to set up a mirror in a friendlier jurisdiction. We must preserve the culture, and TU is part of the culture. ~~~~) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I removed the links to TU as I felt very uncomfortable with linking to that site in this context. While that site maybe perfectly legal, linking it here could make trouble for them. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 01:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC) | I removed the links to TU as I felt very uncomfortable with linking to that site in this context. While that site maybe perfectly legal, linking it here could make trouble for them. --[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 01:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
:I recommend reverting the removal. A solution to potential censorship issues is to create backups and prepare to set up a mirror in a friendlier jurisdiction. We must preserve the culture, and TU is part of the culture. [[User:Lysander|Lysander]] ([[User talk:Lysander|talk]]) 04:31, 8 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:31, 8 May 2015
"some jurisdictions would frown on pictures that focused preferentially on the genital area"
Not just frown on them. In the U.S. they can send you to prison for those pictures. User4 (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
@Wanker
You need to be a bit more careful to what you link to and post... entries like this give the impression of impropriety. Even though some would say this site is x-rated, we need to keep it PG-13. --Etenne (talk) 23:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
I removed the links to TU as I felt very uncomfortable with linking to that site in this context. While that site maybe perfectly legal, linking it here could make trouble for them. --Etenne (talk) 01:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
