Talk:Wes Anderson: Difference between revisions
From BoyWiki
(Created page with "Speculating if someone who has not come out as a BL can be a dangerous and potentially libelous. Plus, I feel strongly that we should not engage i...") |
Thomasmann (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Wes_Anderson#Boylover.3F|Speculating]] if someone who has not come out as a BL can be a dangerous and potentially libelous. Plus, I feel strongly that we should not engage in that. Is there a way you can reword the intro to that section to make it a little less inflammatory and make it focus more on that the man enjoys working with boys etc.. and has many boys in his films and let people draw their own conclusion for that? BTW, thanks for all you work. As I am sure User4 will tell you, I am not a big "thank you' kind of guy" or a flatterer.. just know that your efforts are appreciated. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px|link=Etenne]] 12:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC) | [[Wes_Anderson#Boylover.3F|Speculating]] if someone who has not come out as a BL can be a dangerous and potentially libelous. Plus, I feel strongly that we should not engage in that. Is there a way you can reword the intro to that section to make it a little less inflammatory and make it focus more on that the man enjoys working with boys etc.. and has many boys in his films and let people draw their own conclusion for that? BTW, thanks for all you work. As I am sure User4 will tell you, I am not a big "thank you' kind of guy" or a flatterer.. just know that your efforts are appreciated. --[[Etenne]] [[File:BLSmileyface.png|50 px|link=Etenne]] 12:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Ok, I will find a way to rework it without the speculation. [[User:Thomasmann|Thomasmann]] ([[User talk:Thomasmann|talk]]) 16:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:26, 2 May 2016
Speculating if someone who has not come out as a BL can be a dangerous and potentially libelous. Plus, I feel strongly that we should not engage in that. Is there a way you can reword the intro to that section to make it a little less inflammatory and make it focus more on that the man enjoys working with boys etc.. and has many boys in his films and let people draw their own conclusion for that? BTW, thanks for all you work. As I am sure User4 will tell you, I am not a big "thank you' kind of guy" or a flatterer.. just know that your efforts are appreciated. --Etenne 
12:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, I will find a way to rework it without the speculation. Thomasmann (talk) 16:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
