Template:Portal:Current events/Current events: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|
|
* [http://www.globalnews.ca/academics+defend+flanagans+child+porn+views+as+public+debate/6442819523/story.html Academics defend Flanagan's child porn views as public debate (Global News)] Some academics are coming to the defence of former Stephen Harper strategist Tom Flanagan.They say the well-respected political scientist should not have been so widely condemned for his comments on child pornography.
* [http://www.globalnews.ca/academics+defend+flanagans+child+porn+views+as+public+debate/6442819523/story.html Academics defend Flanagan's child porn views as public debate (Global News)] Some academics are coming to the defence of former Stephen Harper strategist Tom Flanagan.They say the well-respected political scientist should not have been so widely condemned for his comments on child pornography.
*[http://reason.com/blog/2013/02/19/is-your-local-police-department-using-pi Is Your Local Police Department Using Pictures of Pregnant Women and Children for Target Practice?] The "No More Hesitation" series.


* Enormous discussion on [[BoyChat]][http://www.boychat.org/messages/1335911.htm] regarding the pros and cons of James Cantor's[http://jamescantor.com/] (University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine) use of MRIs and other techniques to study the role of the brain in sexuality and his attempts to identify markers demonstrating biological contributions to the development of pedophilia.  
* Enormous discussion on [[BoyChat]][http://www.boychat.org/messages/1335911.htm] regarding the pros and cons of James Cantor's[http://jamescantor.com/] (University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine) use of MRIs and other techniques to study the role of the brain in sexuality and his attempts to identify markers demonstrating biological contributions to the development of pedophilia.  

Revision as of 14:37, 4 March 2013

Current events: May 5, 2024
  • Enormous discussion on BoyChat[1] regarding the pros and cons of James Cantor's[2] (University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine) use of MRIs and other techniques to study the role of the brain in sexuality and his attempts to identify markers demonstrating biological contributions to the development of pedophilia.