User talk:Lysander/Results of an informal survey on what people find physically attractive in boys: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
(Created page with "This article is far from being very professional, and does not belong on BoyWiki. Such an informal survey lacks any validity whatsoever. For reliable information on the quali...")
 
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


When is editorial quality control going to be exercised to prevent "junk articles" such as this one from appearing on BoyWiki? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 12:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
When is editorial quality control going to be exercised to prevent "junk articles" such as this one from appearing on BoyWiki? [[User:User4|User4]] ([[User talk:User4|talk]]) 12:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
==Purposed for deletion==
This entry has does not really have any relevance.
'''4. No indication of importance (Individuals, organizations, events)'''
'''8. Obviously invented'''

Revision as of 13:05, 20 June 2015

This article is far from being very professional, and does not belong on BoyWiki. Such an informal survey lacks any validity whatsoever.

For reliable information on the qualities that BoyLovers appreciate in boys, see:

Rüdiger Lautmann - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rüdiger Lautmann, Die Lust am Kind - Portrait des Pädophilen
Die Lust am Kind

When is editorial quality control going to be exercised to prevent "junk articles" such as this one from appearing on BoyWiki? User4 (talk) 12:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Purposed for deletion

This entry has does not really have any relevance.

4. No indication of importance (Individuals, organizations, events) 8. Obviously invented