User talk:Lysander/Results of an informal survey on what people find physically attractive in boys: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


==Purposed for deletion==
==Purposed for deletion==
This entry has does not really have any relevance.  
This entry has does not really have any relevance. It is simply not an important enough to be included on BoyWiki.  


'''4. No indication of importance (Individuals, organizations, events)'''
*'''4. No indication of importance (Individuals, organizations, events)'''
'''8. Obviously invented'''
 
 
--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 13:07, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:07, 20 June 2015

This article is far from being very professional, and does not belong on BoyWiki. Such an informal survey lacks any validity whatsoever.

For reliable information on the qualities that BoyLovers appreciate in boys, see:

Rüdiger Lautmann - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rüdiger Lautmann, Die Lust am Kind - Portrait des Pädophilen
Die Lust am Kind

When is editorial quality control going to be exercised to prevent "junk articles" such as this one from appearing on BoyWiki? User4 (talk) 12:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Purposed for deletion

This entry has does not really have any relevance. It is simply not an important enough to be included on BoyWiki.

  • 4. No indication of importance (Individuals, organizations, events)


--Etenne (talk) 13:07, 20 June 2015 (UTC)