Talk:Boy Lovers and Zucchini Eaters

Do we really need ad hominem statements about BoyWiki editors in mainspace articles that don't pertain to BoyWiki? Lysander (talk) 16:23, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

See BoyWiki:Deletion policyHowever, my position is this: If you find something that is messed up, wrong, needs work etc... don't just bitch about it... FIX IT--Etenne (talk) 12:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

There's also the BRD cycle; if someone makes an edit, you revert, and they reinstate their edit, you're supposed to bitch about it on the talk page rather than edit warring. However, in this case it was egregious enough that I reverted it again anyway. Lysander (talk) 13:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

About the originator of the article, and his lack of any constructive action taken to improve the article.

The following had been placed on the page as criticism. It was removed by the editor who created the page:

The originator of this article did not take the time to do any real research before creating this article. This is not only sloppy, but shows that the originator of this article lacks the basic skills necessary to create a quality BoyWiki article. To obtain more information about BLAZE (which the originator of this article, even when giving the chance to do so, has refused to do), information which is more accurate and complete than that provided here by the BoyWiki editor who created this article -- one who is actually, in fact, a GirlLover, and who has absolutely no idea what he is talking about on anything to do with the subject of BoyLove and BoyLovers, the reader is advised to please google the following for much much much more and better information. https://www.google.com/search?q=blaze+paedophile+group+australia&btnG=Search&hl=en&gbv=1 User4 09:39, 9 May 2015