Template talk:Cite news: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
Meco (talk | contribs)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Archive facility==
==Archive facility==
The following fields should be added to this and other citation templates: <code>|deadurl= | archive-url= | archive-date= </code>. Also, I question the necessity of making templates editable only by admins. This isn't Wikipedia where some malefactor could cause a terrible embarassment or simply huge problems by vandalizing often-used templates. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 13:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
The following fields should be added to this and other citation templates: <code>|deadurl= | archive-url= | archive-date= </code>. Also, I question the necessity of making templates editable only by admins. This isn't Wikipedia where some malefactor could cause a terrible embarassment or simply huge problems by vandalizing often-used templates. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 13:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
:I unprotected this template so you can edit it. It you want to edit a protected template, all you have to do is ask :)--[[User:Etenne|Etenne]] ([[User talk:Etenne|talk]]) 15:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:47, 9 November 2015

Archive facility

The following fields should be added to this and other citation templates: |deadurl= | archive-url= | archive-date= . Also, I question the necessity of making templates editable only by admins. This isn't Wikipedia where some malefactor could cause a terrible embarassment or simply huge problems by vandalizing often-used templates. __meco (talk) 13:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

I unprotected this template so you can edit it. It you want to edit a protected template, all you have to do is ask :)--Etenne (talk) 15:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)