Voodoo Molestation: Difference between revisions

From BoyWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
==Voodoo Molestation and US Law==
==Voodoo Molestation and US Law==


In a recent decision by the US Supreme Court, it was adjudicated that damages could be awarded based not on the production or distribution of child pornography but by those who have viewed the image in the magical belief that viewing the image has caused damage to the soul of the subject.  
In a recent decision by the US Supreme Court, it was adjudicated that damages could be awarded based not on the production or distribution of child pornography but by those who have viewed the image in the magical belief that viewing the image has caused damage to the soul of the subject. It was maintained that there is a causal link between viewing an image and


Amy http://reason.com/archives/2014/02/12/looking-vs-touching
Amy http://reason.com/archives/2014/02/12/looking-vs-touching

Revision as of 12:13, 28 April 2014

Voodoo describes a set of spiritual folkways which originated from African traditions. Practitioners of Voodoo believe in “sympathetic magic”. Sympathetic magic principles state a powerful link exists between entities that are similar in appearance or come into contact with each other. Items such as photographs, nail clippings, hair and other objects may be used to create an “image” of another person. This “image” may be used to cast a curse or spell. For this reason, there are some practitioners of Voodoo who are cautious of photographs, as they are powerful items capable of harm.[1] Magic and superstition have surrounded photography from the beginning. Because of the way it captured the image, especially of living people, the camera was widely believed to cause death or illness or to steal the soul.[2] While some cultures still believe that photography can steal your soul. Most of the people today allow their photograph to be taken, however infants are protected. It is still believed the souls of infants are fragile and are susceptible to leaving the body.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking

Voodoo Molestation and US Law

In a recent decision by the US Supreme Court, it was adjudicated that damages could be awarded based not on the production or distribution of child pornography but by those who have viewed the image in the magical belief that viewing the image has caused damage to the soul of the subject. It was maintained that there is a causal link between viewing an image and

Amy http://reason.com/archives/2014/02/12/looking-vs-touching

Re-victimization http://www.publicengines.com/blog/2010/02/03/re-victimization-and-restitution-for-victims-of-child-pornography/

Ordered to pay compensation http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/24/court-orders-former-viagra-executive-to-pay-200000-to-woman-photographed-as-a-child-while-being-sexually-abused/


References

External links